kato599@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Jun 30, 4:17 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>> Vickie wrote:
>>> On Jun 30, 12:11 pm, also kato <petey...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> On Jun 29, 6:20 pm, Vickie <lilliputianbizz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>> When it takes a ton of prodding to coax a compliment it makes you
>>>>> wonder why it is so hard for some people. You end up giving up, and
>>>>> you either go the way of self-doubt or self-discovery. I hope the
>>>>> friend I talked with last eve goes toward self-discovery.
>>
>>>> well I for one think you are way hot....no prodding required
>>
>>> 1. - you made my day
>>
>>> 2. - right back at ya
>>
>>> 3. - the check is in the mail
>>
>>> Vickie
>>
>> LOL!! And I agree with Lone Wolf. (long time no see, LW!).
>>
>> Although I'm still trying to figure out the deep inner meaning behind
the
>> term "Canuck" (when I looked it up, it said it normally refers to
French
>> Canadians, and that it was a bit derogatory. But why so, I have no
idea)
>> Besides which, I thought the French Canadians were predominantly in
>> EASTERN
>> Canada, and not Western. Eastern, as in Quebec province. But maybe
>> that's an incorrect assumption. Still, as I understand it, Quebec (and
>> only Quebec) is heavily French, and even wanted to secede, at one
point.-
>
> uh Bill.. you have me confused with another Canuk ( We REALLY do all
> look alike). Lone wolf is on the west coast, I'm on the east coast in
> Quebec, and yes the majority of people here speak French. Deux langues
> le font très intéressant et exciter.
LOL. OK, thanks for the clarification (although I'm still confused).
:-)
But I thought it was Lone Wolf who mentioned Canuk. Or maybe it was
you,
kato. Did you both post in here recently? Damn, I must be losing my
mind. But maybe that's a blessing in disguise.
|
