"Masculist" <MASCULIST@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:7a435572-50d9-4944-a2d4-a45714c15833@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Apr 24, 8:56 am, Turin <TurinTuramba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Apr 24, 9:02 am, " krp" <krp24...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > "Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" <r...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> > messagenews:FIKdnUH5OZ1WxZLVnZ2dnUVZ_sGvnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > > Is that rape by the woman now?
>>
>> > Despite the FACT that this has been "ruled on" by courts -
finding
>> > that
>> > the mere presence of an ERECTION is absolute proof of CONSENT on the
>> > part of
>> > men, but an orgasm on the part of women is NOT.........
An erection in a man is not analogous to an orgasm in the female. In a
female the equivalent is being lubricated or wet.
As it should NOT
>> > be. The "dirty secret" about rape is that one of the MOST difficult
>> > things
>> > for the victim to deal with is that a large percentage of women DO
have
>> > an
>> > orgasm during rape. Psychologically that is murder for the women. It
>> > does
>> > NOT in ANY way mean they "wanted it." It is an AUTONOMIC body
>> > function.
>> > Just as the erection is.
Stop making a mountain out of a molehill. Rape is nothing more than
unconventional dating and is natural. Do we accuse the bull of raping the
cow? lol Most females don't even know if they've had an orgasm and have
to
think about it for a week and discuss it with their girlfriends lol Men
are
the ***ual maestros and will decide for the female when she is ripe for
mating. Females don't know their own minds and men must guide them.
>>
>> As usual,
>
> Jeeze Ken, that counter insurgent feminist piece of crap Turin is
> back.
Turin is going to get his arse kicked.
>
> Smitty
>
>
>> ****kbarrel's subversive Yes-Man response validates the
>> opposition, rather than challenges it. Not only does the dirty little
>> liberal present 90% of the woman's viewpoint, for her - WITH the moral
>> justification behind it - the coward also passively sup****ts the
>> status quo's treatment of Men by stating her view on that, for her,
>> too, in the same tone and terms that she would use. *****.
>> Obviously, Pangborn took a lot with him from his time as a member of
>> NOW.
>>
>> Somewhere along the line, the Men's Movement is going to have to deal
>> harshly with these bending, chicken**** "daddies", if we don't want to
>> start crawling, the way they do. At the very least, we have to stop
>> allowing them to use us for harbor.
>>
>> Truth is, however, that it's only a matter of time, now, before even
>> these worms will have to admit that Western society can no longer
>> afford to pay them to live in homes full of (female-pandering)
>> consumer items, as rewards for being everyday scabs for everything on
>> the cor****ate agenda. That, itself, is going to be the finish of a
>> bunch of them.
>>
>> The global dynamics of energy, money and information are sliding
>> inexorably in favor of other parts of the world, and - due to energy,
>> alone (Ie. fuel prices) - the overall cost of living in the U.S. is
>> already getting too high for growing numbers of people. With the
>> complacent lifestyle going broke, and women knowing that they've got
>> these suckers in the bag, we'll see fewer and fewer examples of the
>> useless posturing jackass, like Pangborn.
>>
>> - - -
>>
>> "This is my beloved son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him":
>>
>> Turin
>>
>> I have such sites to show you...
>> ------------------------
>>
>>
http://www.myspace.com/turin_turambarhttp://groups.google.com/group/Men_First/♂http://turinturambar.fortunecity.com/blog/
>>
>> ------------------------
>>
>> "He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
>> maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
>> burn in hell forever and ever...."
>>
>> -----
>
|
