On Apr 21, 10:17=A0am, NewMan <CloakedRun2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:26:24 -0700 (PDT), Marie.Unwise...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Apr 17, 4:23?pm, "kd8ctl" <KB9...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "MCP" <gf010w5...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >>news:e0ANj.36532$t05.21914@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>
>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=3D/news/2008/04/15/nchi=
l...
>
> >> > By Kate Devlin, Medical Correspondent
> >> > Last Updated: 2:26am BST 15/04/2008
>
> >> > ? ? ?A scientific technique that could allow same-*** couples to
crea=
te
> >> > their own biologicalchildin a laboratory should be allowed under
law,=
a
> >> > group of influential scientists said on Monday.
>
> >> > ? ? ?The experts, all international leaders in embryology research,
c=
alled
> >> > on ministers not to restrict such "im****tant" research.
>
> >> > ? ? ?The laboratory creation of eggs and sperm from other cells
could=
> >> > offer
> >> > hope to thousands of people unable to have children of their own.
>
> >> > ? ? ?Although the creation of both sperm and eggs in a laboratory
is =
still
> >> > at an early stage, the Hinxton group, made up of 40 world-renowned
> >> > experts,
> >> > estimates that the procedure could be used to create human foetuses
w=
ithin
> >> > 15 years.
>
> >> > ? ? ?Creating sperm from female instead of male cells could take
long=
er
> >> > but
> >> > was still "possible", they said.
>
> >> > ? ? ?John Harris, a member of the group and a professor of
bioethics =
at
> >> > the
> >> > University of Manchester, said that ministers should not impede the
> >> > research.
>
> >> > ? ? ?"The real ethical issue at the moment is to ensure that the
impo=
rtant
> >> > scientific research can continue," he said.
>
> >> > ? ? ?The call was made after a conference on ethics and stem cell
res=
earch
> >> > and follows the tabling of a Liberal Democrat amendment to the
> >> > Government's
> >> > controversial Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill, which could
sp=
eed
> >> > up
> >> > the use of "artificial" eggs and sperm in fertility clinics.
>
> >> > ? ? ?The Bill, as it stands, would prevent such eggs or sperm being
g=
iven
> >> > to infertile women. The amendment, which was tabled by Evan Harris
MP=
,
> >> > would
> >> > allow the technique to be used in fertility clinics without the
need =
for
> >> > extra legislation.
>
> >> > ? ? ?Josephine Quintavalle, from Comment on Reproductive Ethics, a
> >> > campaign
> >> > group, said the technique went against the natural reproductive
proce=
ss
> >> > and
> >> > could result in passing genetic fertility problems on to offspring.
>
> >> > ? ? ?The idea of babies being created without a biological father
was=
> >> > "scary", she added.
>
> At the risk of sounding, shall we say, "negative"...
>
> /sarcasm on
>
> I would suspect that Femminazis should be opposing this type of
> "research", and very loundly at that. Imagine, if there was no
> "biological father", then who whould they extract extortionate amounts
> of "childsup****t" from??? Who would the government welfare
> departments be able to charge-back for "childsup****t"???
>
> It would cause mayhem if these poor women - oh I mean "victims" -
> actually had to deal with the consequences of their actions. What ARE
> these "scientists" thinking???
>
> /sarcasm off
>
>
>
> >> > --
> >> > --
> >> > Never trust a woman, how can you trust something that bleeds every
28=
days
> >> > and doesn't die!!!
>
> >> stand by marqueer!- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >Mork wants to have the toad's baby.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I would suspect that Femminazis should be opposing this type of
"research", and very loundly at that. Imagine, if there was no
"biological father", then who whould they extract extortionate
amounts
of "child sup****t" from??? Who would the government welfare
departments be able to charge-back for "child sup****t"???
The "Femminazis" are all for this research. They can finaly make men
disposable. Men will no longer be needed to procreate, and therefore;
you all can stop *****ing about child sup****t that most of you don't
pay anyway. Biological father is just the norm. If this research is
successful then the term will be phased out and replaced with
biological parent.
|
