phelbooth wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2:04 pm, "Bill in Co" <surly_curmudg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>> Emma Anne wrote:
>>> Vickie <lilliputianbizz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Apr 11, 1:46 pm, emma_a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Emma Anne) wrote:
>>>>> Vickie <lilliputianbizz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> It is hard to deal with people who either don't have that or mask
it
>>>>>> well. If you feel they are hiding their real feelings, you get this
>>>>>> drive to want to discover/uncover it. But because people may not
>>>>>> feel things as deeply as you (in general) do, it ends up being a
sort
>>>>>> of road with no end.
>>
>>>>> Ouch. And you accuse me of oblique criticism.
>>
>>>> Then let me ease your mind if I can. I have no idea how you or anyone
>>>> else takes things emotionally and/or at what level. It is why I wrote
>>>> "If you *feel* they are..."
>>
>>>> And honestly Emma, you didn't come to mind when I wrote this.
>>
>>> I didn't think it was pointed at me, but at Doug. Weren't you two
>>> agreeing among yourselves that he has a low EQ and doesn't feel things
>>> much, and who can get along with such a person?
>>
>>> I won't say that you were implying it because it was reasonable for me
>>> to infer, though!
>>
>> And who is responsible for inferences, implications, or interpretations
>> seen by what is written in words?
>>
>> a) the reader
>> b) the writer
>> c) both of the above
>
> I forgot to take notes. Can I have a make up quiz?
No, late work is not accepted, *as is clearly stated on my syllabus*.
And no, I'm not going to change your grade.
And finally, no, I am not responsible for your forgetfulness. Look
within,
grasshopper.
Next?
LOL.
|
