Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Cl***** don't help children

" krp" <krp34@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:PInUk.1177$4g5.1074@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsulldan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:49220663$0$20297$607ed4bc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>> > > > Nothing is "forced down their throats" if the parents don't
have 
>>>> > > > to  do
>>>> > > anything they learned in the cl*****.
>
>>>> > > Says Danny Sullivan who has never seen a state imposed "parenting

>>>> > > plan"
>>>> > > he didn't adore and try to SELL to people.ANY time the STATE
tells
>>>> > > people
>>>> > > they MUST do something ... "or else" it IS cramming it down their
>>>> > > throats.
>>>>
>>>> > < The subject is parenting cl*****. Because in Connecticut
parenting
>>>> > cl*****
>>>> > are required by law.
>>>>
>>>> > Several states do. It is STILL "cramming it down people's throats 
>>>> > when
>>>> > it is not voluntary."
>>>>
>>>> <I still believe it's the best $125 any mother or father can spend 
>>>> while
>>>> getting divorced.
>>>>
>>>> And WHO the fukk do you think YOU are?
>>>
>>> < Just voicing my opinion.
>>>
>>>    No, Danny, you are PONTIFICATING.
>>>
>>>> Lord and master? The HALL MONITOR of ASCPS? Jesus Sullivan? The LORD 
>>>> ALMIGHTY?
>>>> KING SULLIVAN the 21st!
>>>
>>> < And there's yours!
>
>>>    I have never acted as you do like I OWNED ASCPS. That's your gig Mr

>>> Bully.
>
>> Poor widdle kenny ****bag!
>
>    There Mr. BULLY goes again. Hey ****HEAD - who do you think you 
> SCARE?????
>
>> He thinks I'm a bully when I post that his messages about himself have 
>> nothing to do with asCPS!
>
>    It's NONE of your business whatI or anyone else POSTS MR BLOW HARD!
>
>>>> It may or may not be helpful. Kind of depends on
>>>> the individuals. It could be harmful to some folks.
>>>
>>> < How could a parenting class possibly be "harmful?"
>>> .
>>>    They can ignite differences that would not exist but for the 
>>> "lectures" of high opinionates asshole like YOU who often run the 
>>> cl***** and pepper them with their misinformation.
>
>> Misinformation such as? Be specific.
>
>    WHY? Are you giving a test?

I just want to see if you actually have specific MISinformation in mind.

Obviously you don't

>>> The misinformation can cause MANY problems that otherwise would not
have 
>>> existed.
>
>> Which misinformation?
>
>    ANY misinformation about child rearing.

Such as???

Be specific.

>>> Why treat a broken neck when the people have a hangnail?
>
>> You consider a divorce no more serious than a hangnail?
>
>    In many cases it isn't. It's a sad event but in MOST divorces there
is 
> not he acrimony that poisons the minority.

I don't believe that's true.

>    I know that the GREAT DAN SULLIVAN thinks that there is a ONE SIZE
FITS 
> ALL standard on how to parent and HE knows it ALL!

I never said that.

> Too bad it doesn't work that way. We could start with your EXTREMELY 
> STRIDENT view that spanking is always bad.

I never said that spanking is always bad.