On Nov 16, 9:48=A0pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2:47 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > Even though the Supreme Court ruled that the state can impose
> > > parenting cl***** in cases of divorce without probable cause or
> > > evidence that the child is impacted in anyway.
>
> > But if one thing they learn in the cl***** helps resolve an issue that
> > would have involved both of their attorneys, it'll be the best $125
> > they ever spent.
>
> Because the state always knows best, according to Dan Sullivan.
I never said that.
That fact is parenting cl*****, if they cut down on 25% of the
conflict in a divorce, will save the mother and father thousands of
dollars that they won't have to pay their attorneys.
> > > The Court also had to
> > > admit in the same breath after parents waste their time and money
for
> > > paying and attending parenting cl***** the parents can toss
everythin=
g
> > > in the garbage that was forced down their throats.
>
> > How was anything "forced down their throats?"
>
> Do you know that idiom, Dan? Really, don't be an idiot.
Nothing is "forced down their throats" if the parents don't have to do
anything they learned in the cl*****.
|
