On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:29:28 GMT, " krp" <krp34@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"Greegor" <Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:34e261af-4b93-4470-87ae-763029655dd0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> DS > But the case workers decisions, right or
>> DS > wrong, are covered by qualified immunity.
>>
>> Did you know that if they do anything that is outside
>> of agency policy, that it's not covered by qualified immunity?
>>
>> Do you think telling LIES is covered by agency policy?
>
>ABSOLUTELY GREG! It's what Case Workers DO................ You can't sue
>them for lying,
Yes you can.
Winning is another matter, of course. If they have immunity,
there's no realistic chance of winning.
>but you CAN sue them for things they do that are outside the
>statutory authority.
>
Where there's a better chance of winning.
From:
"Kenneth R. Pangborn, MS" <pangborn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
To:
witchhunt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Giglio wrote:
> "Exhibit 23" makes no sense. Apparently, my name is on it, along with
> Michelle Deveraux and Chris Barden. Can anybody explain?
>
I feel so hurt. Diana doesn't even name me. Doesn't she know how
im****tant I am?
Message-ID:<4891B76D.4040703@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
