On Nov 13, 4:05=A0am, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Nov 12, 9:13=A0pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 12, 8:32=A0pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > CT DCF ignored Federal consent decree for 17 years, grag claims, but
> > > the article actually says "it has met the majority of criteria
> > > established by the court." Why can't grag read and comprehend what
he
> > > posts?????
>
> > > They got put under a Federal consent decree 17 years
> > > ago and still haven't completely complied.
>
> > "Got put?"
>
> > What does that mean?
>
> > > How long should the aggrieved plaintiffs wait, Dan?
>
> > Which critical steps remain undone?
>
> > > Do you think the Federal Court's consent decree asked too much of
> > > them?
>
> DS > Again, which critical steps remain undone?
>
> Something the JUDGE ordered.
The typical grag pathetic response.
|
