On Nov 12, 9:13=A0pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Nov 12, 8:32=A0pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > CT DCF ignored Federal consent decree for 17 years, grag claims, but
> > the article actually says "it has met the majority of criteria
> > established by the court." Why can't grag read and comprehend what he
> > posts?????
>
> > They got put under a Federal consent decree 17 years
> > ago and still haven't completely complied.
>
> "Got put?"
>
> What does that mean?
>
> > How long should the aggrieved plaintiffs wait, Dan?
>
> Which critical steps remain undone?
>
> > Do you think the Federal Court's consent decree asked too much of
> > them?
DS > Again, which critical steps remain undone?
Something the JUDGE ordered.
Do you have the order or the compliance re****ts?
They had 17 years to get it right and still haven't.
""Reform from within"" is bull crap.
|
