Recap with old posts NUMBERED and without quotes.
1. Dan Sullivan Nov 10, 5:49 pm
Newsgroups: alt.sup****t.child-protective-services
Subject: lostintranslation posted on fightCPS
LIT wrote
"I was at a legislative hearing yesterday that concentrated on
parental rights during CPS investigations in CT.
When it was my turn to testify, not only did I tell the committee
that
the court appointed attorneys, for the most part, just tell the
parents to do whatever cps wants them to, I introduced the Dec of
Facts form and the Corrections form to them. The committee looked
them
over and it was passed by a vote of all members unanimously to get
the
forms entered as official court forms. It was also suggested to
forward the decision and to introduce the forms for consideration on
a
federal level in Wa****ngton. I was invited to that hearing also which
will take place in Feb of 2007. I am very excited about this and just
felt the need to share with everyone here. There is also another
hearing with the same committee about the procedural process of CPS
investigations on November 21 in which I will also be present at."
2. Greegor Nov 11, 6:52 am
Subject: Re: lostintranslation posted on fightCPS
So?
3. Dan Sullivan Nov 11, 9:35 am
Read it again, grag.
4. Greegor Nov 11, 1:35 pm
I read it carefully again. So what's your point Dan?
5. Dan Sullivan Nov 11, 1:43 pm
The Declaration of Facts form and Corrections form are going to be
OFFICIAL Court forms in Connecticut.
Did you miss that bit of information, grag?
===============================
end of recap reply follows
===============================
Why would you even remotely think I didn't get that?
I have my doubts about it solving the problems though.
For one thing, now that they're official forms,
will they be something that should only be
filled out by the accused parents ATTORNEY?
I've seen how CPS takes good rules and ignores
them or turns them backwards.
A few years ago they were ordered to TRAIN
their idiot caseworkers on how to respect
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
The TRAINING was twisted to be sessions
on how to CON accused parents OUT of
their constitutional rights.
Like how once a parent lets them into their
home, they have forfeit their 4th amendment
right against a search and seizure and CPS
saves the trouble of having to obtain a
court order which they can't get without
sufficient cause.
Remember that video you commented
about, where a caseworker pretended
that lack of cooperation justified
a court order and intrusion?
By the way, did you notice the recent high
court decision that the caseworker would
need the permission of BOTH parents
that live there, not just one?
If either objects, they must cease immediately.
Did you catch that one, Dan? Was it an epiphany for you?
|
