On Nov 10, 2:21 pm, childadvocate <smartn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
CA > The conference recommends that people
CA > come with a sup****t person to help them.
CA > Current perpetrators are not allowed in the conference.
G > Do you mean perpetrators or alleged perpetrators?
G > Do you include all accused as perpetrators,
G > or only people who are criminally convicted?
KW > In CA's mind, anyone who doesn't swallow
KW > the whole SRA is a rampant pandemic, is
KW > a perpetrator. BTW, CA replied to one of
KW > your posts in the Lar$on group. Why she
KW > chose to remove every group you read in
KW > her reply is anyone's guess.
Is it REALLY so hard to figure out, Kent?
What makes you think it's a HER?
Is it Diana Napolis using more fake names?
She's notorious for that so skip the Fregoli crap.
Is it true you replied to me in a newsgroup
I don't regularly read? Please answer without
cutting the cross post list.
G > What about Diana Napolis, is she welcome there?
KW > She most certainly would be.
How WOULD you decide who to exclude, CA?
G > Do convictions impair a believer's entry?
G > Or just non-believers?
KW > Everyone who questions the validity of SRA being real is barred.
That was my impression also.
|
