On Oct 10, 10:20=A0am, "Johnny" <thi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:b3a6d5f2-507c-4b20-803e-9ea1990fc9b1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Oct 9, 9:15 pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 7, 11:30 pm, Kent Wills <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 18:44:45 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >BW > but it is completely possible that
> > > >BW > the obvious mental illness was
> > > >BW > developed AFTER the adoptions took
> > > >BW > place, if, indeed, the children
> > > >BW > were adopted at all.
>
> > > >Betty, It's plain to see where your bias runs.
>
> > > >You'll tell any lie if you think
> > > >it will preserve the ""big picture"" system.
>
> > > >Excusing violations of individual rights
> > > >using the "greater good" excuse is not
> > > >something new, Betty!
>
> > KW > Contrary to what you wish were the case,
> > KW > no one has the right to abuse a child.
>
> > Your statements about my wishes are just puke.
> > It's all you know!
>
> > > >It's another example of how you are
> > > >a complete stooge for the agencies.
>
> > > >Remember, in the USA, RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL
> > > >are supposed to trump expediency, greater good,
> > > >and the ""Big Picture"" every time.
>
> > KW > You didn't have the right to abuse Lisa's daughter.
>
> > I did not abuse any child.
> > Unlike you, I did not ever get a trial on that.
>
> You didn't need a trial.
> You admitted it on usenet.
> We all know. =A0Why lie about it now?
>
> We all know that a posting on Usenet holds up in a court of law!
>
>
>
> > You were found guilty of using a minor in
> > committing Felony Garage Burglary.
> > Was that a bench trial or did you have a jury, Kent?
>
> > You're a regular hamburglar.
> > Do you own the striped socks that go with the outfit?
Again, no one tried him.
Didn't need to.
He admitted it.
Comparing usenet to a court is lame.


|