On Oct 2, 6:46=A0pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Oct 2, 7:29=A0am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 30, 5:58=A0pm, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7642774.stm
>
> > I haven't seen anything else about this in the news. =A0I'd like to
kno=
w
> > more.
> > Greg comments that this was an adopter.
> > I really don't want to get into a pissing contest over 'unknown'
> > factors in this case,
>
> Do you know anything about typical age
> of onset for mental illness, Betty?
Why don't you tell us Greg?
It seems that you THINK you know it all.
The fact is, and you are more than welcome to prove me wrong at any
time you like, mental illness can affect people at ANY age. Often
factors that coincide with onset are stress, loss of a loved one,
chemical imbalance such as low thyroid hormone or menopause, and brain
injury due to head trauma or drug use.
So, go ahead, tell us Greg.
What is the typical age for onset of mental illness and how does it
factor into this case?
> Why don't you explain it to Dan.
Why don't YOU explain it to Dan?
In fact, explain it to us all...you seem to think you know a great
deal about mental illness.
> The woman's age is stated in the article as 43.
So what?
>
> > but it is completely possible that the obvious
> > mental illness was developed AFTER the adoptions took place, if,
> > indeed, the children were adopted at all.
>
> The fact this ***** adopted THREE girls was in
> the BBS article YOU posted the link to!
If I'm not mistaken, I read that the CHILD stated that she was
adopted.
I don't recall anything of proof of that as being factual.
At least, not until Dan posted other links that I looked at.
>
> > It's also extremely possible that these (*if* they were adopted
> > children) were kin****p adoptions that often have far less strict rules
> > attached to them. =A0In fact, it's not uncommon for kin to get
> > guardian****p, and later adopt with nothing more than a simple home
> > study.
> > The issue of whether or not the children were adopted is to be seen,
> > as the statement from the daughter could, or could not be true.
> > What's more im****tant here is to ask why no one missed these children.
> > Weren't they in school? =A0Didn't anyone wonder why they weren't in
> > class? =A0No friends who wondered where they were? =A0No other
relative=
s
> > who missed them? =A0How can two children go missing without anyone
> > taking a second glance at it?
> > Hard to imagine.
One of the links that Dan supplied stated that the woman was of no
biological relation to the children.
People like you, Greg, look for an answer that isn't there, and you
are so rabid about anything DFS related that you don't realize the
damage that your demands could do to families. You never look at the
big picture.
You don't even know if this woman adopted these kids from social
services. For all you know, she could have adopted from a third world
country or a private adoption.
It's easy to see where your comments are leading...
Continue, by all means.
|
