ADOPTER KEEPS BODIES IN FREEZER

On Oct 2, 7:29=A0am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sep 30, 5:58=A0pm, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7642774.stm
>
> I haven't seen anything else about this in the news. =A0I'd like to know
> more.
> Greg comments that this was an adopter.
> I really don't want to get into a pissing contest over 'unknown'
> factors in this case,

Do you know anything about typical age
of onset for mental illness, Betty?
Why don't you explain it to Dan.
The woman's age is stated in the article as 43.

> but it is completely possible that the obvious
> mental illness was developed AFTER the adoptions took place, if,
> indeed, the children were adopted at all.

The fact this ***** adopted THREE girls was in
the BBS article YOU posted the link to!

> It's also extremely possible that these (*if* they were adopted
> children) were kin****p adoptions that often have far less strict rules
> attached to them. =A0In fact, it's not uncommon for kin to get
> guardian****p, and later adopt with nothing more than a simple home
> study.
> The issue of whether or not the children were adopted is to be seen,
> as the statement from the daughter could, or could not be true.
> What's more im****tant here is to ask why no one missed these children.
> Weren't they in school? =A0Didn't anyone wonder why they weren't in
> class? =A0No friends who wondered where they were? =A0No other relatives
> who missed them? =A0How can two children go missing without anyone
> taking a second glance at it?
> Hard to imagine.