On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 19:11:35 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>Brrrrr, how freaky some people are
Like a guy who hangs out in the bathroom while a six or
seven-year-old girl, to whom he is not related, is showering?
> 1 Dragon's Girl Sep 30
> Re: Brrrrr, how freaky some people are... grag??? Does this sound
>familiar???
> 2 Dan Sullivan Sep 30
>
>DS > "The girl said her mother had locked her out of their home..."
>
>That quote does not even appear in the linked article.
>
>Did you system sucks miss that THESE WERE ADOPTED KIDS??
What relevance does that have? Do you think the abuse was more or
less serious as a result of their being adopted?
Are the children any more or less dead?
>
>Damn the system.
It was working when it finally prevented you from further abusing
Lisa's daughter.
>Damn the system that approved this evil ***** to adopt kids.
Damn the system that allowed you to abuse Lisa's daughter for as
long as you did. Had it been working as it should, you wouldn't have
been able to take advantage of the number of times you did to abuse
her.
>Dan, You've got to be a freakin' mental case.
>Is that why you married one?
Interesting question, given that your ex-wife, the one you were
twice convicted of abusing, being incarcerated for one, was (and most
probably still is) mentally ill.
If, as your question suggests, Dan married a mentally ill woman
because he is, well, you've just admitted you're mentally ill. Not
that this was ever in question.
>
>
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7642774.stm
>
>Monday, 29 September 2008 20:21 UK
>
[snip of Greg's further proof that he holds the delusion NO laws,
copyright in this instance, apply to him]
You have a history of ignoring various laws. What is the
specific mental defect you have that gives you the mistaken belief
that you are exempt from any and all laws?
Information about inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson, wife and child
abuser:
Proof that inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson doesn't think he's
bound by criminal or civil law:
Case ID Title Name DOB Role
06571 AGCR015216 STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT HANSON GREGORY
05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC123709 FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INS CO VS GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
HANSON GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC139229 EAGLE PROP MGT VS GREGORY HANSON & LISA WATKINS
HANSON GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC139230 EAGLE PROP MGT VS GREGORY HANSON & LISA WATKINS
HANSON GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC141447 EAGLE PROPERTY MNGT VS LISA WATKINS ET AL HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC141448 EAGLE PROPERTY MNGT VS LISA WATKINS ET AL HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SMSM004543 STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT HANSON GREGORY
05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SMSM008629 STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREGORY S HANSON GREGORY
05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 STCR429489 STATE OF IOWA vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 STCR441449 STATE OF IOWA vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571CRSTCR146191 CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571CRSTCR214087 CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571MASTWG261061 CITY OF MARION vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
The rant inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson authored for Lisa
about how unfair it was for DHS to remove Lisa's daughter from Greg's
continued abuse:
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT OF LINN COUNTY
JUVENILE DIVISION
IN THE INTEREST OF NO. JVJV-12345
CHILD A. LASTNAME
DOB: 00-00-99 MOTION TO CLARIFY
MINOR CHILD MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM
INAPPROPRIATE SERVICES
COMES NOW, Suzy Q. Mother, Pro Se, seeking relief from inappropriate
and inquisitive services.
The Iowa Department of Human Services (DHS) has IMPOSED a Service
Plan
onto us rather than allowing us ACTIVE participation in the FORMATION
of the Service Plan. We have complained about this for MOST of the
last 11 months, and have been laughed off by Judas of DHS, Deb of LSS
and ignored by Juvenile Court. Greg showed the quote from the US
DHHS Caseworker handbook to Deb, outside of our house, using the
trunk
of the car as a work surface. We have seen no sign that she passed
this information to Judas. Deb characterized this in writing as if
it was aberrant behavior and avoidance of personal issues. Judas has
been informed of this by way of SEVERAL do***ents, yet shown no sign
of truly understanding their significance. The Iowa DHS computer
blank FORM was apparently recently modified to make a clear statement
about this point, with boxed in text for emphasis, so it must be
im****tant to SOMEBODY at DHS, perhaps due to a consent decree.
On January 99th, in court, I (Suzy Q. Mother) was asked by the judge
what MORE services would help, but got the "stone wall" treatment
regarding removal of inappropriate services. It clearly seemed to be
a "closed issue" with the Judge. Something is wrong with that. This
flies in the face of the concept of "Active Participation in the
Formation of Service Plan". Federal Case law says "op****tunity
to object after formation is NOT a substitute for ACTIVE
participation
in the FORMATION of the Service Plan". This is a Federal
regulation and it's in the Iowa caseworker manual too.
Services DHS is attempting to IMPOSE upon our family turned out upon
further investigation to be contaminated beyond belief with putrid
INPUT. The words "fi****ng expedition" come to mind.
Domestic Violence Victim Counseling
Never mind that there has been no Domestic Violence in the 3 years
that Greg has been with us.
|
