On Sep 7, 5:04=A0pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sep 7, 7:16 am, Kent Wills <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 22:11:06 -0700 (PDT), Andrew Usher
>
> > <k_over_hb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >On Sep 6, 11:02 pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >> Or we could just send home the 90% of those Foster
> > >> Kids who should never have been removed from
> > >> their parents in the first place.
>
> > >Yes, we must refuse to give them any more money. As long as
> > >we do, they keep on with this nonsense, and the more kids they
> > >take, the more money they'll get! It's ridiculous.
>
> > =A0 =A0 You forgot to mention that more kids equals more expense.
> > =A0 =A0 I speak form first hand experience when I state the stipend
fos=
ter
> > parents are given doesn't come close to coving the expense.
>
> The foster parents aren't the problem; it's the child protection
> bureaucracy.
>
> Andrew Usher
Obviously there are problem foster parents.
And the problem with the child protection industry is the people in it
and their agenda, which isn't the best interest of the children but
the growth and funding of their business.
|
