On Sep 28, 10:20=A0pm, Chiron <chiron...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > =A0 =A023Then if any man shall say unto you,
> > > Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
>
> > > =A0 =A024For there shall arise false Christs,
> > > and false prophets, and shall shew great
> > > signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it
> > > were possible, they shall deceive the
> > > very elect.
>
> > There are passages just like those above
> > all through the Jewish Talmud, and Jesus
> > knowing such, knew he could not pass the
> > test of their scrutiny. It wasn't for Jesus
> > to determine that. Only by fulfilling the
> > Jewish prophecies could he do that.
>
> OK, first of all, Jesus never saw the Talmud. =A0
EVERY Male Jew had the Talmud available to him.
It is said that Jesus studied with the Essene s on the
Dead Sea. Furthermore Jesus was teaching in the Temple
when he was only 13 years of age. Which just happens
to coincide with the age a Male Jew is allowed to teach
from Hebrew Scripture, having been taught the Law since
childhood. In order for a Jew to become a Jew, they must
be able to read from the Torah, which is Hebrew.
> Second of all, there are
> *not* any such passages in the Talmud. =A0The Talmud is a very cryptic,
> highly condensed text that is nearly impossible to read without a solid
> background in Orthodox Judaism and Hebrew scriptures. =A0You aren't
going
> to just flip open one of the sixty volumes and start reading.
And yet supposedly YOU have, but NObody else CAN?
>
> You get verses like "The fully righteous cannot stand in the place of
> the penitent sinner". =A0Do you know what that means? =A0Do you know
that
> there are whole books devoted to explaining that single line? =A0The
> Talmud is like that all the way through.
>
> > Every person whom was ever said to
> > be a "Christ" (King), Jew or NonJew alike
> > was proclaimed by the Jews AFTER they
> > had completed such tasks.
>
> Guess you didn't read what I said earlier. =A0"Christ" doesn't mean
> "king". =A0It means, "one who has been anointed". =A0Kings were anointed
> (Saul, for example), but so were prophets and others.
I read it and ignored it, just like I do most disinformation.
The Jews were expecting a KING, that is why at the top
of Jesus cross was the placard which read "King of the Jews".
That's what he was accused of, go read yer bible, dude.
>
> So anyone who had been anointed would have been a christ, but in
> Hebrew that word would have been "mo****ach" - again, simply one who
> has been anointed.
>
> The Jews wouldn't have had a non-Jewish anointed one. =A0Anointing was a
> religious act.
>
> > If Jesus was a "Christ", it was not based
> > upon his professional accomplishments in
> > life. It was because of the type man that he
> > was. An alpha-beta, a mixture, a man of peace,
> > and brother to all mankind. It was his personal
> > accomplishments not his professional ones
> > that made him stand out among men.
>
> Of course, because Jesus's profession was carpenter. =A0He certainly
> didn't attain fame as a result of that. =A0You're just nattering away
now=
..
>
> Jesus wasn't a professional "rabbi"; he wasn't a professional teacher,
> preacher, or healer. =A0He was, according to Christian scripture, a
> carpenter.
All "Rabbi" means is teacher. He was certainly called that often
enough by other Jews. Again go read yer bible.
>
> But the whole point of Jesus wasn't that he was or wasn't this or that;
> it was what he taught. =A0People get so worked up over Jesus being a
> god-man, they forget to listen to his message. =A0That's the im****tant
> part.
>
> But it's hard to do what Jesus did. =A0So much easier to just put Jesus
> up on a pedestal, as I said before, and wor****p him as a deity. =A0That
> way we don't even have to try to emulate him. =A0Emulate a god? =A0No
way=
!
>
> But that's what the message was all about.
>
> --
> You are a very redundant person, that's what kind of person you are.
More bile, hate mongering, and disinformation on your part!
Exactly how old are you?!?
|
