Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Support > Diabetes > The Optimum LDL...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 49 Topic 25456 of 26422
Post > Topic >>

The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......

by "GysdeJongh" <jongh711@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 26, 2008 at 01:59 PM

Evolution is always a trade off, it's just never : "The more the better" , 
or : "The Lower the Better" .See the ACCORD study where the A1C had a 
optimum.See the Alzheimer study where the choleseterol had an optimum.See 
the body weight study where the BMI had an optimum (and not at BMI = 20 !)

The human body is  a Lean Mean Survival Machine fine-tuned to function 
optimal given the cir***stances by our ancestors.If the cir***stances 
changes, from nuts with dinosaurs to french fries with hamburgers than the

machine fails......

The LDL also has an optimum, it is actually higher than my last LDL.....
Free article :
http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/reprint/179/5/427

Independent associations between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and 
cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Interpretation: Among patients with type 2 diabetes, the association
between 
LDL cholesterol and cancer was Vshaped, whereby both low and high levels
of 
LDL cholesterol were associated with elevated risk of cancer.

Every thing in moderation
Except laughter.....
Gys
 




 49 Posts in Topic:
The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
"GysdeJongh" &l  2008-08-26 13:59:02 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Alan S <loralgtweighta  2008-08-26 23:21:16 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
"GysdeJongh" &l  2008-08-26 23:07:39 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Nicky <ukc802466929@[E  2008-08-27 21:38:46 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
sassybklynlady@[EMAIL PRO  2008-09-01 10:32:56 
Private Message
   2008-09-01 10:52:33 
Private Message
   2008-09-01 16:41:13 
Private Message
   2008-09-01 18:06:09 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Alan S <loralgtweighta  2008-09-07 14:23:50 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
nobody <annonymous@[EM  2008-08-26 10:53:44 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Alan S <loralgtweighta  2008-08-27 06:44:53 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Tiger_Lily <me@[EMAIL   2008-08-26 12:14:37 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
"GysdeJongh" &l  2008-08-26 23:14:06 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
"GysdeJongh" &l  2008-08-27 00:16:02 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Alan S <loralgtweighta  2008-08-27 08:44:38 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-08-28 12:50:13 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Alan S <loralgtweighta  2008-08-29 09:31:53 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Tiger_Lily <me@[EMAIL   2008-08-26 19:19:44 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Alan S <loralgtweighta  2008-08-27 12:49:44 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-08-28 12:42:40 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
"bgl" <bjone  2008-08-31 12:02:48 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Nicky <ukc802466929@[E  2008-08-31 21:54:15 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-09-01 02:07:27 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Tiger_Lily <me@[EMAIL   2008-08-31 15:14:50 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Nicky <ukc802466929@[E  2008-08-31 22:46:12 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Tiger_Lily <me@[EMAIL   2008-08-31 16:30:08 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Nicky <ukc802466929@[E  2008-09-01 09:05:04 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
terryc <newssixspam-sp  2008-09-02 01:12:07 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
"Robert Miles"   2008-09-02 18:24:44 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Tiger_Lily <me@[EMAIL   2008-09-02 17:34:11 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
terryc <newssixspam-sp  2008-09-03 10:17:56 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
"bgl" <bjone  2008-09-02 20:59:49 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-09-04 01:18:11 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
"bgl" <bjone  2008-09-03 21:35:30 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
RodS <fred@[EMAIL PROT  2008-09-04 02:54:48 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
MI <quilchenapark@[EMA  2008-09-04 02:57:47 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Trinkwasser <spam@[EMA  2008-09-05 18:33:36 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
"Michelle C" &l  2008-09-05 10:43:21 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Màck©® <Màck@[EMAIL PR  2008-09-05 14:39:11 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
"bgl" <bjone  2008-09-05 16:53:47 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
RodS <fred@[EMAIL PROT  2008-09-06 01:45:23 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-09-01 16:10:00 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Nicky <ukc802466929@[E  2008-09-01 20:43:18 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-09-03 00:42:52 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Alan S <loralgtweighta  2008-09-07 14:26:30 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Tiger_Lily <me@[EMAIL   2008-09-01 11:48:50 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Nicky <ukc802466929@[E  2008-09-01 20:41:00 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Trinkwasser <spam@[EMA  2008-09-01 19:21:58 
Re: The Optimum LDL is about 3,NOT LOWER......
Tiger_Lily <me@[EMAIL   2008-09-01 14:08:40 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 0:10:13 CST 2008.