Nobody's listening . . . except risible flame psychos like you, apparently,
LOL!
If you want to be a monitor of polemical comity, why didn't you jump in
when
you saw that your pal's first words were: "Ah, the *Anti Benzo Squad* is
on
the war path again." You don't care anything about the issues raised in
this
thread--you're just jumping in for blood s****t. Another ethical cipher
makes
his mark on the world.
"~*LiveLoveLaugh*~" <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:4856c2e5$0$20197$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "anon" <shopathonic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:It-dnSBquPYkAMvVnZ2dnUVZ_oTinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> HA!!!
>>
>> This is the FOURTH (maybe fifth) time you have vowed not to post any
more
>> of your ad hominem filth in this thread, but like a typical drug
addict,
>> you cannot control yourself.
>
> Man oh man, I'm busting a gut now!! Philip? A drug addict??
> LOLOLOLOLOL!! Why to know dear Philip is to love him!! :)
>
> And anon?? I think benzo's are dangerous. I took them for 24 years and
> finally stopped. Was I addicted? Probably, but I never abused them.
And
> yet, I still don't agree with one word you've said yet. You're barking,
> but do one is listening.
>
> HAND!
>
> --
>
> ·.·´¨ ¨)) -:¦:-
> ¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
> Laurie
> ((¸¸.·´ ..·´
> -:¦:- ((¸¸ ·.·
>
> *~*LiveLoveLaugh*~*
>
> All that I am or hope to be, I owe to my angel mother.
> ~Abraham Lincoln
>
>
>
>>
>> There is nothing in your posts in this thread that add anything to this
>> discussion but your patented personal nastiness and hostility. The very
>> first sentence of your very first post in this thread was as follows:
>> "Ah, the *Anti Benzo Squad* is on the war path again." That is purely
>> nasty, hostile ad hominem garbage. And your posts have degenerated from
>> there, including your inconsiderate piling on of a mountain of
>> tendentious studies, most of them funded by big drug companies who have
a
>> vested interest in promoting these drugs.
>>
>> And now what is the essence of your post? To advance the discussion
with
>> rational argument and facts? No . . . it is to command me to shut up
>> because you obviously cannot refute my points with logic or facts. This
>> totalitarian impulse is of a piece with your chronic ad hominem
nastiness
>> and personal hostility and your indifference to the suffering of the
>> countless thousands opeople who have fared badly with these drugs--unto
>> complete dysfunction and ruined lives.
>>
>> You, sir, on all these counts are an ethical atrocity and disgrace.
>>
>> "Philip Peters" <philip@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:485678dd$0$14344$e4fe514c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> zumone2002 schreef:
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Search for "William Kaufman" and "troll" and you should get enough
>>>> results to learn about anon's usual behavior.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for enlightening us on this subject. While benzo use is and
>>> should be a subject of debate his attitude has indeed been that of a
>>> troll and I will not engage in further interaction with him. That's
the
>>> fastest way to get rid of him anyway ;-)
>>>
>>> Philip
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> People might consider valerian and/or melatonin for sleep and Kava
or
>>>>> GABA
>>>>> for daytime anxiety. If those don't work, discuss benzos with your
>>>>> doctor,
>>>>> but proceed with caution, and educate yourelf about the risks.
>>>>
>>>> Since you are still posting this to alt.sup****t.crohns-colitis you
>>>> should have mentioned that melatonin should not be taken with
>>>> corticosteroids.
>>>>
>>>> From http://www.drugs.com/cdi/melatonin.html
>>>> "Do NOT use Melatonin if:
>>>> * you are allergic to any ingredient in Melatonin
>>>> * you are taking immunosuppressants (eg, cyclos****ine),
>>>> corticosteroids (eg, prednisone), or nifedipine
>>>> * you have a history of immune system disorders, liver disease,
or
>>>> stroke
>>>> * you are pregnant or breast-feeding"
>>>>
>>>> From November 2004 (http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/melatsum.htm)
>>>> " Melatonin for Treatment of Sleep Disorders" (a review)
>>>> "Conclusions
>>>>
>>>> * Evidence suggests that melatonin is not effective in treating
>>>> most primary sleep disorders with short-term use, although there is
>>>> some evidence to suggest that melatonin is effective in treating
>>>> delayed sleep phase syndrome with short-term use.
>>>> * Evidence suggests that melatonin is not effective in treating
>>>> most secondary sleep disorders with short-term use.
>>>> * No evidence suggests that melatonin is effective in alleviating
>>>> the sleep disturbance aspect of jet lag and ****ftwork disorder.
>>>> * Evidence suggests that melatonin is safe with short-term use.
>>>> * Evidence suggests that exogenous melatonin has a short
half-life
>>>> and it penetrates the blood-brain-barrier.
>>>> * Evidence suggests a link between endogenous melatonin and the
>>>> sleep cycle.
>>>> * Evidence suggests a link between endogenous melatonin and the
>>>> temperature rhythm."
>>>>
>>>> Pharmaceuticals are better regulated and better studied than
>>>> "nutritional" supplements. Yes, there are risks with medications but
>>>> there are known benefits. Supplements like melatonin have risks too
>>>> but evidence to sup****t any benefits is lacking.
>>>>
>>>> Willy boy, you are not a medical professional. You are not even well
>>>> read on the subject. Of course, anyone taking medical advice from an
>>>> USENET kook, gets what they paid for.
>>>>
>>>> HTH,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Luke
>>
>>
>
|
