HA!!!
This is the FOURTH (maybe fifth) time you have vowed not to post any more
of
your ad hominem filth in this thread, but like a typical drug addict, you
cannot control yourself.
There is nothing in your posts in this thread that add anything to this
discussion but your patented personal nastiness and hostility. The very
first sentence of your very first post in this thread was as follows: "Ah,
the *Anti Benzo Squad* is on the war path again." That is purely nasty,
hostile ad hominem garbage. And your posts have degenerated from there,
including your inconsiderate piling on of a mountain of tendentious
studies,
most of them funded by big drug companies who have a vested interest in
promoting these drugs.
And now what is the essence of your post? To advance the discussion with
rational argument and facts? No . . . it is to command me to shut up
because
you obviously cannot refute my points with logic or facts. This
totalitarian
impulse is of a piece with your chronic ad hominem nastiness and personal
hostility and your indifference to the suffering of the countless
thousands
opeople who have fared badly with these drugs--unto complete dysfunction
and
ruined lives.
You, sir, on all these counts are an ethical atrocity and disgrace.
"Philip Peters" <philip@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:485678dd$0$14344$e4fe514c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> zumone2002 schreef:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Search for “William Kaufman” and “troll” and you should get enough
>> results to learn about anon's usual behavior.
>
>
>
> Thanks for enlightening us on this subject. While benzo use is and
should
> be a subject of debate his attitude has indeed been that of a troll and
I
> will not engage in further interaction with him. That's the fastest way
to
> get rid of him anyway ;-)
>
> Philip
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>> People might consider valerian and/or melatonin for sleep and Kava or
>>> GABA
>>> for daytime anxiety. If those don't work, discuss benzos with your
>>> doctor,
>>> but proceed with caution, and educate yourelf about the risks.
>>
>> Since you are still posting this to alt.sup****t.crohns-colitis you
>> should have mentioned that melatonin should not be taken with
>> corticosteroids.
>>
>> From http://www.drugs.com/cdi/melatonin.html
>> “Do NOT use Melatonin if:
>> * you are allergic to any ingredient in Melatonin
>> * you are taking immunosuppressants (eg, cyclos****ine),
>> corticosteroids (eg, prednisone), or nifedipine
>> * you have a history of immune system disorders, liver disease, or
>> stroke
>> * you are pregnant or breast-feeding”
>>
>> From November 2004 (http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/melatsum.htm)
>> “ Melatonin for Treatment of Sleep Disorders” (a review)
>> “Conclusions
>>
>> * Evidence suggests that melatonin is not effective in treating
>> most primary sleep disorders with short-term use, although there is
>> some evidence to suggest that melatonin is effective in treating
>> delayed sleep phase syndrome with short-term use.
>> * Evidence suggests that melatonin is not effective in treating
>> most secondary sleep disorders with short-term use.
>> * No evidence suggests that melatonin is effective in alleviating
>> the sleep disturbance aspect of jet lag and ****ftwork disorder.
>> * Evidence suggests that melatonin is safe with short-term use.
>> * Evidence suggests that exogenous melatonin has a short half-life
>> and it penetrates the blood-brain-barrier.
>> * Evidence suggests a link between endogenous melatonin and the
>> sleep cycle.
>> * Evidence suggests a link between endogenous melatonin and the
>> temperature rhythm.”
>>
>> Pharmaceuticals are better regulated and better studied than
>> “nutritional” supplements. Yes, there are risks with medications but
>> there are known benefits. Supplements like melatonin have risks too
>> but evidence to sup****t any benefits is lacking.
>>
>> Willy boy, you are not a medical professional. You are not even well
>> read on the subject. Of course, anyone taking medical advice from an
>> USENET kook, gets what they paid for.
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> --
>> Luke
|
