Oh, please--have you seen the stream of abuse emanating from "Inky"
heretofore? The guy is a malicious nutcase--but his abusiveness never
moved
you to comment for a moment. You and your seventh-grade wolfpack mentality
care not a whit for who is trying to be compassionate and helpful or
not--you just stick up for your "gang' members, no matter how rude and
ethically atrocious they are. Consider--this "Inky" has been issuing
completely irrational and irresponsible apologetics for a potentially
life-damaging drug . . . based on what? Not a single do***ent of
scientific
evidence or a single study--just his own anecdotal experiences. Yet he
ignores the reams of do***entation I provided from other people who have
been so damaged by these drugs and from the voluminous scientific studies
do***enting their very real risks. Where is Inky's compassion--and
yours--for the people who might be misled into popping benzos like candy
on
Inky's reckless advice? Where's your concern for the havoc that might be
wrought in their lives? There is none--because for you this is not about
ethics, reason, science, or compassion--it's about the seventh-grade game
of
sticking up for your buddy not matter what the risks to other people. How
pathetic.
"nanny" <gloria006@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:48556c17$0$4071$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This is very poor sup****t of a "comrade" in pain. No wonder you want to
> remain "anon". There is a place for scientific do***entation, and a
time
> for sharing years of experience. I prefer the latter myself. Nanny
> "anon" <shopathonic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:SIKdnduaVZoJ18jVnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Poor Inky--
>> Your posts are 100-percent devoid of (a) scientific do***entation
(being
>> confined to your own perosnal experience, which has no universal
>> significance) and (b) logic--just because tobacco is more lethal than
>> benzos does not mean benzos are not dangerous and potentially
>> destructive. That's like saying that because Bib Macs contain no
>> hydrogenated oils, they are better for you than Dunkin Donuts.
Fine--does
>> that mean that it would be just dandy for people for have Big Macs
three
>> times a day?
>> I'm sorry that life has brought you to this point--not so much that
>> you can't functino without a tranquilizer, but that you can't think or
>> write with the logic or clarity expected of a fifth-grader.
>> The scientific evidence I have presented in this thread is profuse.
It
>> ovewhelms your feeble whining.
>>
>> "Inky" <InkyNL@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
news:235331a2-9e99-4b4f-854e-123146284595@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On 15 jun, 01:07, "anon" <shopatho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> why don't you consult a competent
>>>> psychiatrist and see about trying to wean yourself from this
>>>> mind-rotting
>>>> drug?
>>>
>>> From 5 - 6 panic attacks a day to virtually none, I'd say my
>>> psychiatrist is _very_ competent. Now, I shall let alt.sup****t.crohns-
>>> colitis be, because this discussion does not belong there. However,
>>> the other drug, I asked you about (and you did not answer) does belong
>>> there, since tobacco products are the #1 cause of GERD. You see, there
>>> is a lot more to worry about in this world than someone's medication
>>> issues, wich you don't seem to approve of. Sadly for you, it is not
>>> your call to make. I trust my docters and my own experience over your
>>> rantings. Over the past 10 years, I've been off benzos several times
>>> with no problems at all.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
|
