I enjoy insulting people? What is Luke's demented post below, if not a
bizarre gob of rhetorical spit? Does he suppose that anyone reading this
post will not recognize him as a spiteful, repressed little ball of anger?
Tsk, tsk. I invite everyone to read the 2006 debate on this subject to see
how thoroughly thrashed poor Luke was--he just skulked away in silence
from
that one. Still nursing his two-year-old grudge over that one--a truly
psychopathic pattern--he resurfaces here with his usual farrago of ad
hominem nicknames and hateful jabs.
Luke, you cipher--I'd be glad to take you on once again on this or any
other
subject of your choice. For starters, exactly what don't I understand
about
the difference between stomach lining and surviving in the gut? I'm the
one
who pointed out this critical distinction to your hapless interlocutor,
who
had no clue about it--no more than you seem to have.
The proof is in the pudding--or in your kishkas. You sallied forth two
years
ago to dispute the value of enteric-coated probiotics--not out of
intellectual honesty, but out of pure spite--which is why you were
soundlyl
thrashed in that exchange. Yet NOW YOU ARE TAKING ENTERIC-COATED
PROBIOTICS
YOURSELF! LOL! As I said, the proof is in the kishkas, not in your
demented
spews of psychopathy and hate, which discredit your every word--along with
the fact that you use the very kind of product you worked so hard to
discredit two long years ago!
Go cry in the stew of your pathetic frustrations, you pathetic
hypocrite--Lukey.
"zumone2002" <zumone2002@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:04ca8d01-bdd4-4fe3-9fb1-c8c9f40a3ad9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave,
Beez wrote:
> On Jun 6, 6:59?pm, "anon" <shopatho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > So when Luke recommends an enteric-coated probiotic, he's a voice of
> > reason.
> > When someone outside of your little circle of imaginary Internet
friends
> > makes the same recommendation, it's time for a water fight. How sad.
>
> Now I know you're trolling, Luke didn't *recommend* anything in his
> post. Sayonara a non...
You see why most of us don't reply to Willy?
He's like a broken record with the few ideas he presents, can't seem
to understand things, like the difference between surviving the
stomach and surviving in the gut. He enjoys insulting people, well
trying, when people realize what he is, his opinion become worthless.
But this discussion cinched his identity, compare Willy Kaufman's
ranting about probiotics in 2006 to anon's ranting now.
--
Luke
P.S. People posting via Google
Google seems to be censoring posts with non-Google URLs. My original
post had links to pubmed and the abstract I quoted and Google would
not post it. To make things worse, the error message isn't any help
in determining why the post fails


|