BOB (sd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) writes:
> Bob Officer <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:k04324ts3rus2fnj4uf6ctuke5a59ebtur@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> On Wed, 07 May 2008 05:49:23 GMT, in alt.abortion, BOB <sd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Rockinghorse Winner <rockinghorse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>news:slrng22d68.c23.rockinghorse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>> In alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, klunk had the audacity to
>>>> say that:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Rockinghorse Winner" <rockinghorse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:slrng21tkc.6oi.rockinghorse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> In alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, BOB had the audacity to
>>>>>> say that:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rockinghorse Winner <rockinghorse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:slrng1vona.c4h.rockinghorse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, klunk had the audacity
>>>>>>>> to say that:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> powerful experience would probably have to take the form of an
>>>>>>>>> extraterrestrial visitation whereby an alien intelligence
>>>>>>>>> provides evidence of our planet being seeded with
>>>>>>>>> extraterrestrial dna... even then, i'm sure
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That you think this is more plausible than a supernatural Creator
>>>>>>>> is, really, laughable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just about ANYTHING ELSE is more plausible than a "supernatural
>>>>>>> creator" Rockingwhore.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *R* *H*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is that, BOB?
>>>>>
>>>>> because it is by definition, beyond nature...
>>>>
>>>> Precisely, because how can nature be the cause of itself? Think about
>>>> it. Anything, taken in it's totality, cannot be the cause of itself.
>>>> So, for instance, you cannot be the cause of yourself. A rock can't
> be
>>>> the cause of itself. And, by the same exact reasoning, nature as a
>>>> whole -- i.e. the universe -- cannot be the cause of itself.
>>>>
>>>When at a loss for logic, try slinging a load of BS to see if fly,
> right
>>>Rockingwhore?
>>
>> Bob Do you know a rocking horse is a torture device, the victim was
>> placed ****d upon the horse with his ankles tied to his knees. A
>> sword was placed blade up upon the back of the horse. the horse was
>> then rocked and as the victim's legs got tired he would end up
>> lowering himself on the rocking-horse. The victim's torture was use
>> to gain coerced confessions and statements form the victims family
>> members. This was one of Torquemada's favorite methods of getting
>> confessions for the holy church. The victim was usually servilely cut
>> and died of the wounds.
>>
> No Bob, I didn't know that but thanks for the information. I'm not
> surpriesed that it was used by the religious kooks. The Rockingwhore
who
> posts here would probably like to use that torture method on pregnant
> women who might consider getting an abortion. It fits the anti-choice
> mindset.
>
>>
>
|
