BOB wrote:
> DaveInLakeVilla@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dave in Lake Villa) wrote in news:24714-
> 46D9C9CA-794@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Their babies got to have a life and a home . What do aborted babies
> > get to have because 'mom' thought ***ual 'freedom' / immorality was
> > more im****tant ?
> >
> Non-existance, which is what they had to start with, DavIL.
>
> Btw you fool, are you trying to equate freedom with immorality?
If a pregnant woman stands on a bathroom scale, she finds she is
heavier. So when abortions are performed, they are not performed on
anything non-existent, or abortion would not be necessary.
Yes, before the woman got pregnant, the unborn child was non-existent.
So there was a time when the child didn't exist.
So? A year before anyone was born, that person was non-existent. So,
since we all had non-existence to start with, murdering anyone should
be legal?
"Freedom" to kill innocent people who are not trying to hurt others,
how can you equate that, being allowed to violate the rights of
others, with freedom, where everyone's rights are respected, because
everyone is equal?
John Savard
|
