"NeffJew" <spew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:xlaKh.297809$_X1.39373@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <et6jre01hod@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "LC" <LC_____@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>><flame group dumped>
>>"NeffJew" <spew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:OHzJh.236956$PW4.172545@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> to grip the region again
>>>>It's the middle east, you ****ing moron. Theocracies are as common as
>>>>sand around there. I suppose that you think Saudi Arabia is a paragon
>>>>of secular democracy?
>>> You know something dude, I was really impressed with your response at
>>> first.
>>So rather than refute quibbler's points, you're reduced to whining?
> Now hold on just one moment. I could clearly see that refuting would be
an
> exercise in futility. I posted my opinions already. >
And they were shown to be deficient.
Deal with it, or counter his arguments.
Your choice.
>>> It was well thought out, well worded but because of the fact that
you're
>>> a liberal you can't resist childishly hurling insults.
>>This, from the troll that, in the past several days, has peppered his
>>posts with phrases like "cowardly liberals", "abortion loving Nazis",
>>"abortion lovers".
> I was addressing liberals as a whole. Not individual personal attacks.
Uh huh.
So, if I post that history overwhelmingly shows that Usenet anti-choice
newbie trolls tend to be a dishonest and none-too-bright demographic, you
won't take it personally?
> Sometimes I get annoyed when I'm reading a response to my post then
> suddenly "you ****ing moron!" pops up. It's distracting.
If it bothers you, rise above it or killfile the offender and move on.
Of course, if you were *truly* interested in intelligent dialogue, you
wouldn't constantly pepper your posts with inflammatory phrases like
"cowardly liberals", "abortion loving Nazis", and "abortion lovers".
Otoh, then you probably wouldn't get the attention you obviously crave,
either.
> When an exchange is reduced to a verbal assault I lose interest. Maybe
> that's the goal!
Or, perhaps the same uninformed and specious 'arguments' have been made by
dishonest and none-too-bright anti-choicers thousands of timesbefore?
Look, many highly intelligent and well-informed pro-choice contributors
have
unsubscribed over the years, largely because of the low quality of
discussion.
Your average anti-choice contributor is armed with little more than Bible
passages, plagiarized articles, and phrases like "baby killers" and
"abortion loving Nazis".Cutting and pasting propaganda from 'Lifenews',
etc.
does not constitute debate.
Use this information as you will.
Stay or leave, it matters not.
<snip>
|
