Talk About Network

Google





Support > Lasik-eyes > FTC - Marketing...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 3723 of 3734
Post > Topic >>

FTC - Marketing of Refractive Eye Care Surgery: Guidance for Eye Care Providers

by "Brent Hanson - USAEyes.us" <do_not_contact@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 23, 2008 at 11:36 AM

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/guides/eyecare2.shtm
Marketing of Refractive Eye Care Surgery:
Guidance for Eye Care Providers
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has prepared this guidance on marketing

Lasik and alternative laser refractive procedures, known as "surface 
ablation techniques," for eye care providers. It explains the requirements

of Section 5 of the FTC Act that apply to the promotion of these
procedures. 
The FDA has approved excimer laser systems for Lasik and surface ablation 
techniques, and millions of people have undergone these procedures in
search 
of better vision.

Requirements for Advertising Under the FTC Act
The FTC enforces Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act), 
which prohibits deceptive or unfair practices in or affecting commerce,
and 
Section 12 of the FTC Act, which prohibits the dissemination of any false 
advertisement to induce the purchase of any food, drug, device, or
service.

An ad is deceptive under Section 5 of the FTC Act if it has a statement -
or 
omits information - that:

  a.. is likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably under the 
cir***stances; and
  b.. is "material" - that is, im****tant to a consumer's decision to buy
or 
use the product.
An ad or business practice is unfair if:

  a.. it causes or is likely to cause substantial consumer injury that a 
consumer could not reasonably avoid; and
  b.. the injury is not outweighed by any benefit the practice provides to

consumers or competition.
The FTC looks at an ad from the point of view of the "reasonable consumer"
- 
the typical person looking at the ad. Rather than focusing on certain
words 
or phrases, the FTC looks at an ad's entire context - words, phrases, and 
pictures - to determine what it conveys to consumers.

Both "express" and "implied" claims are im****tant to the FTC. An express 
claim is one that is made literally in the ad. For example, a claim that 
"more of our [ABC Lasik Center] patients achieve 20/20 vision than those
of 
our competitors" is an express claim that ABC's patients achieve better 
results. An implied claim is made indirectly or by inference. For example,

the representation made by a patient in a testimonial that "the procedure 
was easy" implies that there are no complications or side effects for most

of ABC Lasik Center's patients. Under the law, advertisers must have proof

to back up any claim that consumers reasonably take from an ad.

The FTC also looks at what the ad does not say - that is, if omitting 
information leaves consumers with a misimpression about the product or 
service. For example, a representation that ABC Lasik Center "provides a 
free consultation" may mislead consumers if it doesn't say that a 
non-refundable deposit is required before their candidacy for the surgery
is 
determined by a healthcare professional, if that is the case.

Whether a claim would be "material" - that is, im****tant to a consumer's 
decision to buy or use the product or service also is a key factor for the

FTC. Examples of material claims are representations about a product or 
service's performance, features, safety, price, or effectiveness.

Finally, a company must have a "reasonable basis" for its claims before it

runs an ad. A "reasonable basis" means objective evidence that sup****ts
the 
claim. The kind of evidence depends on the claim. At a minimum, an 
advertiser must have the level of evidence that it says it has. For
example, 
the statement, "clinical studies show that the laser used by Dr. X results

in 20/20 vision 85 percent of the time," must be sup****ted by clinical 
studies to that effect for Dr. X's patients. If the ad isn't specific, the

FTC looks at several factors to determine what level of proof is
necessary, 
including what experts in the field think is needed to sup****t the claim.
In 
most cases, ads that make health or safety claims must be sup****ted by 
"competent and reliable scientific evidence," which means tests, studies,
or 
other scientific evidence that has been evaluated by qualified people. In 
addition, any tests or studies must be conducted using methods that
experts 
in the field accept as accurate. Statements from satisfied customers are
not 
sufficient to sup****t a health or safety claim or any other claim that 
requires objective evaluation.

Under FTC law, ads, promotional brochures, informational tapes, seminars
and 
other forms of marketing of Lasik or any other refractive surgery to 
consumers should not have express or implied claims that are false or 
unsubstantiated, or that omit material information. In particular, claims 
that convey an inaccurate impression about the safety, efficacy, success
or 
other benefits of any form of refractive surgery would raise concerns
about 
deception. For example, a claim for Lasik or surface ablation procedures 
suggesting that patients who are nearsighted, with no other refractive 
vision deficiencies, can "throw away their eyegl*****" may be deceptive 
without further qualification, if, after surgery, a significant number of 
patients require eyegl***** for best vision, for reading, or under 
particular cir***stances, such as for night driving.

Claims about success rates, long-term stability, or predictability of 
outcome must be substantiated by competent and reliable scientific
evidence. 
Keep in mind that FDA approval of the excimer laser for use in Lasik is
not, 
by itself, adequate substantiation for all specific claims about the
success 
of the procedure.

In addition, representations about the safety or efficacy of Lasik or any 
other refractive surgery sometimes may require disclosures of key 
information about health risks or limitations associated with the surgery
to 
prevent charges of deception. An advertisement with express or implied 
representations that the procedure is "safe," or "clinically proven to be 
safe," for example, also should tell consumers that, like any surgery, 
Lasik, or other advertised refractive surgery, has risks and potential 
complications, and that they will be discussed during a surgical 
consultation prior to the procedure.

For further guidance on FTC requirements for advertising, see the FTC
Policy 
Statement on Deception at www.ftc.gov/bcp/policystmt/ad-decept.htm and the

FTC Policy Statement on Unfairness at 
www.ftc.gov/bcp/policystmt/ad-unfair.htm.

For more information contact Matt Daynard in the FTC's Division of 
Advertising Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, at mdaynard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
(202) 326-3291.

October 2008
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
FTC - Marketing of Refractive Eye Care Surgery: Guidance for Ey
"Brent Hanson - USAE  2008-10-23 11:36:10 
Re: FTC - Marketing of Refractive Eye Care Surgery: Guidance fo
Glenn Hagele - USAEyes.or  2008-10-23 15:38:52 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 14:07:39 PST 2009.