RayGordon <ray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:7d8cbc98-d2d0-43ce-ab0b-
34c0c29e9cf9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Kismet video is back, this time with a free "sample" video of its new
> "talent," some brown-haired actress. Also returning is Dou7g (the 7
> is silent), the subject from "Katja Hypnotizes Doug." It is PAINFUL
> to see such a once-f8ine outfit as Kismet reduced to dumpster-diving,
> for talent, but this has occurred. Until Kismet restores its previous
> standards, I will review them as an outfit, rather than dealing with
> the cookie-cutter CRAP they have been putting out in the past two
> years.
>
> The new sample from Kismet is a "test video" shot with a hand-held
> camera. This is actually the video's main positive, because the
> actress was trying to "win the part" and thus dialed up the
> dominance. She appeared to be an experienced dominatrix, or at least
> naturally dominant. She wasn't even a terrible hypnotist, but the
> Kismet standard used to be great (like Ashlee Schull), rather than
> competent.
>
> Aside from the bad lighting, sound, and camera angles -- at least this
> was free, unlike "Hypnotic Fun" -- in the video, you can very clearly
> hear an INFANT CRYING IN THE NEXT ROOM. How unpro****ingfessional can
> one get? Femdom hypno in the living room while a kid is crying in the
> next room? Oh yeah, Hollywood is shaking in its boots.
>
> Kismet asked for feedback on this video, but did so on inraptured.com,
> a site which censors some dissent. That benefits Kismet here, because
> the "talent" is also not very attractive physically, though she
> appears a bit hypnotic. The scripting sucked, again, but there's also
> a BIG cavet here: there was no induction on the free video, which
> means this woman has not proven any ability to hypnotize.
>
> With "Yes," Kismet was threatening to take over the industry.
> "Hypnothings" was an excellent followup, with an extremely hot and
> talented actress (Marta McGonagle), who has gone on to better things
> After that, it has been all downhill, with a parade of internet no-
> talents churning money by milking an undemanding customer base. Their
> most recent work puts them on the level of a tranceproviders.
>
> Joe brags about being so successful with his videos, yet he should
> take that money and become a SAG shop, so he can get some REAL talent
> to do this, and produce some truly professional and innovative work.
> Instead, we get amateur garbage that plays like a bad YouTube video.
> Even when the production quality is high, like with Jen & Barry, the
> results are unimpressive.
>
> The men who claim to want better quality hypnosis are undercutting
> their own ends by rewarding crap with their praise and purchasing. As
> long as Kismet keeps selling its lower-quality work, they have no
> incentive to stop producing it, any morethan trashproviders, Bernie,
> or the other ****-factories would.
>
> Even Ashlee might not be able to save Kismet now anyway, since she's
> done two sequels to Yes, and they clearly sucked as well. Looks like
> a double one-hit wonder here with the better future for the ***y-
> hypnosis consumer laying elsewhere.
>
> This video was astounding for how crappy it was as a total package. A
> truly new low for someone capable of much, much better.
>
And somehow it does not affect you in the least that no one has indicated
a desire for your 'reviews' and indeed numerous people have told you that
your opinions on these films are juvenile and stupid.
Rather sad, actually...
--
I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do
not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send
me money.
The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language
Tard: n Someone whose actions/words make her/him look like an idiot in
public but s/he is too disconnected to reality to realize it.
|---------------------------------|
| At my age a woman's mind should |
| be more im****tant than her body.|
|---------------------------------|
|
