K. A. Cannon <kcannon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:g79u42$240$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Odious" <Odious@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> posted
> <TdRlk.9489$KZ.3949@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> in alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 4 Aug
> 2008 22:05:08 -0700:
>
>>
>>"Peter J Ross" <pjr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:slrng9fi1q.meg.pjr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:56:07 +0545, Kadaitcha
>>> Man <foaming.jubblies@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter J Ross, ye degenerate drab, a wonder and a pointing stock to
>>>> every idle rascal, ye exhorted:
>>>>
>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:54:19 -0400, Ray Gordon,
>>>>> creator of the "pivot" <ray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Time to put AUK out of business.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh no! Please don't put us out of business the way you put Google
>>>>> out of business!
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/do***ents/opinions/06D0306P.pdf>
>>>>
>>>> "DISMISSED with prejudice."
>>>>
>>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>>>
>>>> We are doomed, Mister Ross. Doomed!
>>>
>>> This is my favourite part:
>>>
>>> While we have endeavored to make sense of Plaintiff's racketeering
>>> and civil conspiracy claims, these sections of the Complaint are
>>> completely incomprehensible. Parker spends eleven pages and
>>> sixty-six paragraphs discussing the "RICO enterprise" but fails to,
>>> in any way, make clear his allegations. He then adds an additional
>>> five paragraphs for civil conspiracy in which he simply refers back
>>> to his unintelligible RICO claims.
>>>
>>> Parker v. Google was perhaps the funniest kooksuit ever.
>>>
>>
>>His new one seems to be giving it a run for the money.....
>>
>>http://www.cybersheet.com/lawsuit-viacom.pdf
>
>
> Oh Deity....stoopidity like this is rare.
I can't wait for the "dismissed with prejudice" ruling. He makes Babs
Schwartz look sane.
|
