"Peter J Ross" <pjr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:slrng9fi1q.meg.pjr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In alt.usenet.kooks on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:56:07 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
> <foaming.jubblies@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>> Peter J Ross, ye degenerate drab, a wonder and a pointing stock to
every
>> idle rascal, ye exhorted:
>>
>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:54:19 -0400, Ray Gordon,
>>> creator of the "pivot" <ray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Time to put AUK out of business.
>>>
>>> Oh no! Please don't put us out of business the way you put Google out
>>> of business!
>>>
>>> <http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/do***ents/opinions/06D0306P.pdf>
>>
>> "DISMISSED with prejudice."
>>
>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>
>> We are doomed, Mister Ross. Doomed!
>
> This is my favourite part:
>
> While we have endeavored to make sense of Plaintiff's racketeering
> and civil conspiracy claims, these sections of the Complaint are
> completely incomprehensible. Parker spends eleven pages and sixty-six
> paragraphs discussing the "RICO enterprise" but fails to, in any way,
> make clear his allegations. He then adds an additional five paragraphs
> for civil conspiracy in which he simply refers back to his
> unintelligible RICO claims.
>
> Parker v. Google was perhaps the funniest kooksuit ever.
>
His new one seems to be giving it a run for the money.....
http://www.cybersheet.com/lawsuit-viacom.pdf
|
