In alt.usenet.kooks on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:56:07 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
<foaming.jubblies@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> Peter J Ross, ye degenerate drab, a wonder and a pointing stock to every
> idle rascal, ye exhorted:
>
>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:54:19 -0400, Ray Gordon,
>> creator of the "pivot" <ray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> Time to put AUK out of business.
>>
>> Oh no! Please don't put us out of business the way you put Google out
>> of business!
>>
>> <http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/do***ents/opinions/06D0306P.pdf>
>
> "DISMISSED with prejudice."
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
> We are doomed, Mister Ross. Doomed!
This is my favourite part:
While we have endeavored to make sense of Plaintiff’s racketeering
and civil conspiracy claims, these sections of the Complaint are
completely incomprehensible. Parker spends eleven pages and sixty-six
paragraphs discussing the “RICO enterprise” but fails to, in any
way,
make clear his allegations. He then adds an additional five paragraphs
for civil conspiracy in which he simply refers back to his
unintelligible RICO claims.
Parker v. Google was perhaps the funniest kooksuit ever.
--
PJR :-)
,http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/>
<http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/>
|
