Talk About Network

Google





Support > Hypnosis > OT: Re: 5-9? No...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 29 of 29 Topic 3223 of 3377
 Post > Topic >>

OT: Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?

by Paul Knight <knightp@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 16, 2008 at 04:57 PM

>> At least he has finally admitted to losing in court. Congratulations, 
>> Ray. Admitting your failures is the first step to recovery. Next, you 
>> have to admit that YOU have a problem.
> 
>      You have that backwards.  His admitting he has the problem, if he
> in fact has one, is the first step.

Normally, you would be right, but this is Ray. We all know he is a bit 
backwards.




 29 Posts in Topic:
Re: Gordon Roy Parker abandons all hope in his frivolous lawsuit
 Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-14 22:50:02 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
 "Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-14 17:30:10 
Re: gordy roy parker, posting as the Anonymous cockroach ray gor
 "Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-14 21:57:45 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
 Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-14 19:37:48 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
 It's that guy again <B  2008-06-14 19:57:46 
Re: Soon to be 0 wins 21 losses
 "ZFORCE" <er  2008-06-15 09:39:38 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 "Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-15 07:34:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 "foad" <jdfh  2008-06-15 11:49:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 "Ted E Bear" &l  2008-06-15 07:29:26 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-15 07:44:45 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 Thom E. Geiger <ThomEG  2008-06-15 09:29:02 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 "Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-15 16:24:19 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
 "John Michaels"  2008-06-15 10:48:51 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
 "HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 18:05:06 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
 "John Michaels"  2008-06-15 17:23:30 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
 Frisco Del Rosario <fr  2008-06-15 17:53:17 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
 "HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 23:55:08 
Re: gordy roy calls THAT a WIN???
 "Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 05:03:11 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 An Old Friend <an.old@  2008-06-15 14:33:16 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-15 14:43:28 
Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
 Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-16 05:10:01 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
 nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-16 12:41:41 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
 "Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-19 08:32:59 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
 "fakeobama@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-19 12:30:35 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 It's that guy again <B  2008-06-16 06:53:16 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
 Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-15 18:24:05 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
 Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-16 09:40:22 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
 "Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 21:53:54 
OT: Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
 Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-16 16:57:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 6:23:27 PST 2009.