Talk About Network

Google





Support > Hypnosis > Re: gordy roy c...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 18 of 29 Topic 3223 of 3377
Post > Topic >>

Re: gordy roy calls THAT a WIN???

by "Krus T. Olfard" <braaap@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 16, 2008 at 05:03 AM

"John Michaels" <hpnotst@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:xPidnTsBTNQfL8jVnZ2dnUVZ_rPinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s****ts.gymnastics/browse_frm/thread/
> 91ef11e9dc1031cf/e37ee27aaeb6c7a6?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#e37ee27aaeb6c7a6 
> 
> I included the whole thread.  The person posting that you want to pay 
> attention to is Dean Dyer.  Ray sued him for defamation, no RICO.
> 
> Read what Dyer says about the settlement. 
> 
> 

So that was gordy roy parker's big legal 'win'.
How effin' pathetic!

If that is the closest you've ever come to actually winning in court, 
gordy roy, and this must be so since you always claim this as a win, you 
are truly a legal buffoon, as well as a liar (I have the posts with 
headers, gordy roy, so if you do not like me calling you a liar, well, 
too effin' bad, baybee).

Sues for $200K and settles for $250? That's not even 1%!
I just love seeing a financial geeneeus at work!

-- 
I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do 
not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send 
me money.

The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language

Tard: n Someone whose actions/words make her/him look like an idiot in 
public but s/he is too disconnected to reality to realize it.
 




 29 Posts in Topic:
Re: Gordon Roy Parker abandons all hope in his frivolous lawsuit
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-14 22:50:02 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-14 17:30:10 
Re: gordy roy parker, posting as the Anonymous cockroach ray gor
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-14 21:57:45 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-14 19:37:48 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
It's that guy again <B  2008-06-14 19:57:46 
Re: Soon to be 0 wins 21 losses
"ZFORCE" <er  2008-06-15 09:39:38 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-15 07:34:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"foad" <jdfh  2008-06-15 11:49:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Ted E Bear" &l  2008-06-15 07:29:26 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-15 07:44:45 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Thom E. Geiger <ThomEG  2008-06-15 09:29:02 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-15 16:24:19 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
"John Michaels"  2008-06-15 10:48:51 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
"HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 18:05:06 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
"John Michaels"  2008-06-15 17:23:30 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
Frisco Del Rosario <fr  2008-06-15 17:53:17 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
"HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 23:55:08 
Re: gordy roy calls THAT a WIN???
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 05:03:11 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
An Old Friend <an.old@  2008-06-15 14:33:16 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-15 14:43:28 
Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-16 05:10:01 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-16 12:41:41 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-19 08:32:59 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
"fakeobama@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-19 12:30:35 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
It's that guy again <B  2008-06-16 06:53:16 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-15 18:24:05 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-16 09:40:22 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 21:53:54 
OT: Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-16 16:57:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 9:44:19 PST 2009.