Talk About Network

Google





Support > Hypnosis > Re: 5-9, not 0-...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 15 of 29 Topic 3223 of 3377
 Post > Topic >>

Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post

by "John Michaels" <hpnotst@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 15, 2008 at 05:23 PM

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s****ts.gymnastics/browse_frm/thread/91ef11e9dc1031cf/e37ee27aaeb6c7a6?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#e37ee27aaeb6c7a6

I included the whole thread.  The person posting that you want to pay 
attention to is Dean Dyer.  Ray sued him for defamation, no RICO.

Read what Dyer says about the settlement.




 29 Posts in Topic:
Re: Gordon Roy Parker abandons all hope in his frivolous lawsuit
 Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-14 22:50:02 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
 "Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-14 17:30:10 
Re: gordy roy parker, posting as the Anonymous cockroach ray gor
 "Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-14 21:57:45 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
 Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-14 19:37:48 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
 It's that guy again <B  2008-06-14 19:57:46 
Re: Soon to be 0 wins 21 losses
 "ZFORCE" <er  2008-06-15 09:39:38 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 "Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-15 07:34:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 "foad" <jdfh  2008-06-15 11:49:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 "Ted E Bear" &l  2008-06-15 07:29:26 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-15 07:44:45 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 Thom E. Geiger <ThomEG  2008-06-15 09:29:02 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 "Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-15 16:24:19 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
 "John Michaels"  2008-06-15 10:48:51 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
 "HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 18:05:06 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
 "John Michaels"  2008-06-15 17:23:30 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
 Frisco Del Rosario <fr  2008-06-15 17:53:17 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
 "HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 23:55:08 
Re: gordy roy calls THAT a WIN???
 "Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 05:03:11 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 An Old Friend <an.old@  2008-06-15 14:33:16 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-15 14:43:28 
Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
 Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-16 05:10:01 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
 nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-16 12:41:41 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
 "Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-19 08:32:59 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
 "fakeobama@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-19 12:30:35 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
 It's that guy again <B  2008-06-16 06:53:16 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
 Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-15 18:24:05 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
 Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-16 09:40:22 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
 "Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 21:53:54 
OT: Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
 Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-16 16:57:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 5:29:40 PST 2009.