Talk About Network

Google





Support > Hypnosis > Re: 5-9, not 0-...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 14 of 29 Topic 3223 of 3377
Post > Topic >>

Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)

by "HeeroYuy" <h@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 15, 2008 at 06:05 PM

"John Michaels" <hpnotst@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:va2dnbvm4KKey8jVnZ2dnUVZ_tbinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gordon aka Ray, why don't you do a Google search on yourself and that 
> supposed victory in Florida.  You know what the other side said.  You 
> claim it is confidential.  You forgot to tell the other side.  I am sure

> the temp agency has a similar story.  Maybe we should ask.  I bet they 
> paid you to go away.  It is actually quite entertaining to see you try
to 
> spin it.  They said you took $250 to go away because they told you what 
> you could be on the hook for.  Reality or Rayality is a *****.  If you
had 
> such a great case, why didn't take it all the way?  Why all of sudden
did 
> you have a bunch of excuses about why you took the money?
>
> Gordon, getting paid off to go away isn't a victory I would brag about. 
> It is economic terrorism.
>
> Gordon, your record speaks for itself.  End of story.

Well now I'm curious. What did they say Gordon was on the hook for?

>
> "Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" <ray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message 
> news:ipadnZctVc7RY8nVnZ2dnUVZ_tXinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> The previous poster believes the audience is stupid enough to believe
it, 
>> even if the record shows otherwise.
>>
>> The previous poster also chooses to intentially lie about me despite 
>> knowing, or where it should know, the truth.
>>
>> Under its math, losing cases are counted up to four or five times 
>> (appeals and refilings after dismissal without prejudice), while
ignoring 
>> cases where I have prevailed or settled.
>>
>> By involving itself in this case, however, those who post to this
thread 
>> can and may very well find themselves involved in discovery to
ascertain 
>> their motives for misleading others and attempting to affect the
outcome 
>> of this case.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
>>
>> Finding Your A-Game:
>> http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
>> Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy (FREE!)
>> The book Neil Strauss and VH-1 STOLE The Pivot From
>>
>> Click HERE: for the ORIGINAL pivot chapter:
>> http://www.cybersheet.com/pivot.pdf
>>
>> Here's my Myspace Page: And Pickup Blog (FREE advice)
>> http://www.myspace.com/snodgrasspubli****ng
>>
>> Don't rely on overexposed, mass-marketed commercial seduction methods 
>> which no longer work.  Learn the methods the gurus USE with the money 
>> they make from what they teach.
>>
>> Thinking of taking a seduction "work****op?" Read THIS:
>> http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187
>>
>> Beware!  VH-1's "The Pickup Artst" was FRAUDULENT.  Six of the eight 
>> contestants were actors, and they used PAID TARGETS in the club.  The 
>> paid targets got mad when VH-1 said "there are no actors in this club" 
>> and ruined their prromised acting credit.  What else has Mystery lied 
>> about?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
 




 29 Posts in Topic:
Re: Gordon Roy Parker abandons all hope in his frivolous lawsuit
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-14 22:50:02 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-14 17:30:10 
Re: gordy roy parker, posting as the Anonymous cockroach ray gor
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-14 21:57:45 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-14 19:37:48 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
It's that guy again <B  2008-06-14 19:57:46 
Re: Soon to be 0 wins 21 losses
"ZFORCE" <er  2008-06-15 09:39:38 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-15 07:34:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"foad" <jdfh  2008-06-15 11:49:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Ted E Bear" &l  2008-06-15 07:29:26 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-15 07:44:45 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Thom E. Geiger <ThomEG  2008-06-15 09:29:02 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-15 16:24:19 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
"John Michaels"  2008-06-15 10:48:51 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
"HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 18:05:06 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
"John Michaels"  2008-06-15 17:23:30 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
Frisco Del Rosario <fr  2008-06-15 17:53:17 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
"HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 23:55:08 
Re: gordy roy calls THAT a WIN???
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 05:03:11 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
An Old Friend <an.old@  2008-06-15 14:33:16 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-15 14:43:28 
Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-16 05:10:01 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-16 12:41:41 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-19 08:32:59 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
"fakeobama@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-19 12:30:35 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
It's that guy again <B  2008-06-16 06:53:16 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-15 18:24:05 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-16 09:40:22 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 21:53:54 
OT: Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-16 16:57:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 6:01:33 PST 2009.