Talk About Network

Google





Support > Hypnosis > Re: 5-9, not 0-...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 20 of 29 Topic 3223 of 3377
Post > Topic >>

Re: 5-9, not 0-21

by Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 15, 2008 at 02:43 PM

in article ipadnZctVc7RY8nVnZ2dnUVZ_tXinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Ray Gordon,
creator of the "pivot" at ray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 6/15/08 7:34 AM:

> By involving itself in this case, however, those who post to this thread
can
> and may very well find themselves involved in discovery to ascertain
their
> motives for misleading others and attempting to affect the outcome of
this
> case.

In a thread about your distinct LACK of success in court, you thought it a
good idea to threaten more people with legal action?

You really are a mess, fr00t l00p.

Get help... before it's too late.
 




 29 Posts in Topic:
Re: Gordon Roy Parker abandons all hope in his frivolous lawsuit
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-14 22:50:02 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-14 17:30:10 
Re: gordy roy parker, posting as the Anonymous cockroach ray gor
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-14 21:57:45 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-14 19:37:48 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
It's that guy again <B  2008-06-14 19:57:46 
Re: Soon to be 0 wins 21 losses
"ZFORCE" <er  2008-06-15 09:39:38 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-15 07:34:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"foad" <jdfh  2008-06-15 11:49:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Ted E Bear" &l  2008-06-15 07:29:26 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-15 07:44:45 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Thom E. Geiger <ThomEG  2008-06-15 09:29:02 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-15 16:24:19 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
"John Michaels"  2008-06-15 10:48:51 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
"HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 18:05:06 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
"John Michaels"  2008-06-15 17:23:30 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
Frisco Del Rosario <fr  2008-06-15 17:53:17 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
"HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 23:55:08 
Re: gordy roy calls THAT a WIN???
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 05:03:11 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
An Old Friend <an.old@  2008-06-15 14:33:16 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-15 14:43:28 
Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-16 05:10:01 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-16 12:41:41 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-19 08:32:59 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
"fakeobama@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-19 12:30:35 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
It's that guy again <B  2008-06-16 06:53:16 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-15 18:24:05 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-16 09:40:22 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 21:53:54 
OT: Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-16 16:57:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 5:59:19 PST 2009.