On Jun 15, 4:34 am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\""
<r...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> The previous poster believes the audience is stupid enough to believe
it,
> even if the record shows otherwise.
>
> The previous poster also chooses to intentially lie about me despite
> knowing, or where it should know, the truth.
>
> Under its math, losing cases are counted up to four or five times
(appeals
> and refilings after dismissal without prejudice), while ignoring cases
where
> I have prevailed or settled.
>
> By involving itself in this case, however, those who post to this thread
can
> and may very well find themselves involved in discovery to ascertain
their
> motives for misleading others and attempting to affect the outcome of
this
> case.
>
Gordon, I hate to break the news to you but:
1. Filing an appeal is a separate and independent case and counts
separately.
2. Refiling after dismissal is a separate legal case. One loss for
the dismissal.
It runs something like this:
One loss for the dismissal, one loss on the refiled case and one loss
on the appeal where a case runs its course. That's three dings.
One loss for a dismissal without refiling; one ding.
One loss where everything has been adjudicated and you just plain out
lost and didn't do anything but lick your wounds. Another ding.
You don't get, or lose, anything for a settlement. It's neutral. You
also don't lose anything for motions quashed, ruled against, or
anything else you did that failed within the evolution of the case.
It's only the terminal condition that counts.
Ask not for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for you. Ding, ding, ding.
Ding, ding. Ding.
Gordon, you call into question the proposition that mathematics is a
universal language we can use to communicate with alien life forms.
Vance
|
