Re: 5-9, not 0-21

"Ray Gordon, prevaricating pontificator" <ray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
message news:ipadnZctVc7RY8nVnZ2dnUVZ_tXinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The previous poster believes the audience is stupid enough to believe
it, 
> even if the record shows otherwise.
>
What record?  Where can your "wins" be found?  If they are not on record 
they can't BE part of the record.

> The previous poster also chooses to intentially lie about me despite 
> knowing, or where it should know, the truth.
>
Again, where can these "wins" be found?

> Under its math, losing cases are counted up to four or five times
(appeals 
> and refilings after dismissal without prejudice), while ignoring cases 
> where I have prevailed or settled.
>
Like it or not, losing a MTD is a loss.  You can argue about "rainouts" if

you want, but it doesn't make it so.

> By involving itself in this case, however, those who post to this thread

> can and may very well find themselves involved in discovery to ascertain

> their motives for misleading others and attempting to affect the outcome

> of this case.
>
Don't you ever get tired of making empty threats and making a fool of 
yourself?
<spam snip> 



 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------     
                http://www.usenet.com