Talk About Network

Google





Support > Hypnosis > Re: gordy roy p...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 29 Topic 3223 of 3377
Post > Topic >>

Re: gordy roy parker, posting as the Anonymous cockroach ray gordon, doesn't understand anything that he reads... ever...

by "Krus T. Olfard" <braaap@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 14, 2008 at 09:57 PM

gordy roy parker, newzloon, legal buffoon, and known liar (I still have 
the posts with headers, gordy roy), spewed the following 
misinterpretation of something he read: 

> 
> It can't do a THING to stop it, all it can do is whine to USENET about
> it. 
> 
> 

No, tardboy, you have a problem in comprehension there. He is NOT trying 
to stop any kooksuit you have filed, HE'S LAFFING AT IT AND you (sorry, 
you still do not and never will deserve any capital letter in any word 
that refers to you, including the name gordy roy parker).

-- 
I'm an opinionated bastard. Everything I post is my opinion. If you do 
not like my opinions then killfile me - if you like my opinions then send 
me money.

The KTO Dictionary of Subjective Language

Tard: n Someone whose actions/words make her/him look like an idiot in 
public but s/he is too disconnected to reality to realize it.
 




 29 Posts in Topic:
Re: Gordon Roy Parker abandons all hope in his frivolous lawsuit
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-14 22:50:02 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-14 17:30:10 
Re: gordy roy parker, posting as the Anonymous cockroach ray gor
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-14 21:57:45 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-14 19:37:48 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
It's that guy again <B  2008-06-14 19:57:46 
Re: Soon to be 0 wins 21 losses
"ZFORCE" <er  2008-06-15 09:39:38 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-15 07:34:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"foad" <jdfh  2008-06-15 11:49:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Ted E Bear" &l  2008-06-15 07:29:26 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-15 07:44:45 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Thom E. Geiger <ThomEG  2008-06-15 09:29:02 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-15 16:24:19 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
"John Michaels"  2008-06-15 10:48:51 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
"HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 18:05:06 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
"John Michaels"  2008-06-15 17:23:30 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
Frisco Del Rosario <fr  2008-06-15 17:53:17 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
"HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 23:55:08 
Re: gordy roy calls THAT a WIN???
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 05:03:11 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
An Old Friend <an.old@  2008-06-15 14:33:16 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-15 14:43:28 
Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-16 05:10:01 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-16 12:41:41 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-19 08:32:59 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
"fakeobama@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-19 12:30:35 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
It's that guy again <B  2008-06-16 06:53:16 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-15 18:24:05 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-16 09:40:22 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 21:53:54 
OT: Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-16 16:57:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 6:18:02 PST 2009.