Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Support > Hypnosis > Re: Gordon Roy ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 29 Topic 3223 of 3367
Post > Topic >>

Re: Gordon Roy Parker abandons all hope in his frivolous lawsuit

by Nomen Nescio <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 14, 2008 at 10:50 PM

Gordon Roy Parker wrote under the stolen pseudonym 'Ray Gordon':

> I was targeted in addition to Sloan, for other reasons, most involving
my 

being a s***bag and object of general ridicule?

> Whether or not the board acted in conspiracy, as I alleged in my
lawsuit, 

it is natural for good people to appear to be in conspiracy when they
unite
against the village cretin who is defecating in public places.

> They literally fiddled while Rome was burning

but Rome did not burn GRP enough, since the asshole is still able to post.
Shame, that.

> in the courts

where the judge will wonder why FRG left the kid gloves on when dealing
with
a ****ing loser like Gord.

> have been serving the defendants this month

Not always successfully, lol, only 5 by my count.

> Took his breath away

You have had a premonition, I see? Your breath will soon be taken away.

> One more time: I said those who were so 

sure that you are a pervert, were totally right.

> relatively tame postings of mine were somehow horrible

postings such as like the brutal rapes of underage gymnast girls.

> what was done while impersonating me was downright criminal

and FRG should be castigated for giving me such an easy ride.

> I don't have a IQ

- as y'all suspected.

> No, I'm saying that those who took issue with my posts

deserve congratulations and encouragement.

> My lawsuit included several e-mails

"Lawsuits" cannot include "e-mails", 'wipe.

> I also have a count for fraud 

on the grounds of being a well-known fraudster and hold-up dude.

> Anonymous internet harassment, for example, is now a felony

which is why I conduct my harassment under the real name "Ray Gordon",
lol.

> Five defendants have been served

but not the principal defendant.

> the previous one may be time-barred

just like wiser heads told me it would be.

> The FIRST subpoena I send out once discovery begins will be to

the old ***** Penny Skullcrack Parker for not drowning me at birth.

> The reason I was impersonated is 

that Ray Gordon is a goddamn child-molesting ****.

> a rapist's motivation in a rape

is something to which I give a good deal of thought every day.

> I am also not Sam Sloan

though Gordon Roy Parker impersonated Sam more than once, thinking that
no one would notice.

> I would have liked to name Texas Tech and 

they would like you to go suck on the business end of a 45.

> that would have made the litigation tremendously complicated.

!haHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHa!

> I happen to be an Expert-rated chessplayer

while I am not being an olympic-rated weightlifter or pitching for the
Yankees.

> It's not just reputation, as 

Gordon Roy Parker has none.

> this is not      a libel case.

Sure right there.

> mine is rooted in 

Gordon Roy Parker being a pathetic loser.

> Truth is not a defense against nothing but defamation.

!haHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHa!

> it was a separate attack on me for a completely different motive

which is that for most people the very existence of grp-ie on our planet
is an affront to human dignity and which must be remedied.

> Sloan could have 

That has no relevance to anything. Are you an idiot?

> Sloan also did not 

That also has no relevance to anything. Yes, you are an idiot.

> Nothing yet

Those words will serve as your epitaph, ****ker. "Nothing yet"

> I have a few left

not when we are through with you, you won't have any left.

> I may ask for 

a late abortion to be performed on my momma's corpse?

> why I waited to serve the other defendants (so everyone would 

have a laugh at about the same time.)

> I never said that

OK, that can be on your tombstone too. "Nothing yet. I never said that"

> You don't hear me saying anything

because nothing im****tant is ever said.

> Don't rely on overexposed, mass-marketed commercial seduction methods

but instead rely on the ravings of a virgin (blow-up dolls and twenty
buck whores excepted) and herpes-infested, basement-dwelling faggot.

So, have you paid Thom Geiger the money the Third Circuit court ordered
you to pay him? Why not?
 




 29 Posts in Topic:
Re: Gordon Roy Parker abandons all hope in his frivolous lawsuit
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-14 22:50:02 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-14 17:30:10 
Re: gordy roy parker, posting as the Anonymous cockroach ray gor
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-14 21:57:45 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-14 19:37:48 
Re: Anonymous cockroach doesn't like my lawsuit
It's that guy again <B  2008-06-14 19:57:46 
Re: Soon to be 0 wins 21 losses
"ZFORCE" <er  2008-06-15 09:39:38 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-15 07:34:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"foad" <jdfh  2008-06-15 11:49:31 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Ted E Bear" &l  2008-06-15 07:29:26 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-15 07:44:45 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Thom E. Geiger <ThomEG  2008-06-15 09:29:02 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-15 16:24:19 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
"John Michaels"  2008-06-15 10:48:51 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong)
"HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 18:05:06 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
"John Michaels"  2008-06-15 17:23:30 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
Frisco Del Rosario <fr  2008-06-15 17:53:17 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21 (wrong) Here is the post
"HeeroYuy" <  2008-06-15 23:55:08 
Re: gordy roy calls THAT a WIN???
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 05:03:11 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
An Old Friend <an.old@  2008-06-15 14:33:16 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
Alex <akaufmann@[EMAIL  2008-06-15 14:43:28 
Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
Nomen Nescio <nobody@[  2008-06-16 05:10:01 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-06-16 12:41:41 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
"Ray Gordon, creator  2008-06-19 08:32:59 
Re: Dealing with vexatious litigants: Parker, Sloan
"fakeobama@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-19 12:30:35 
Re: 5-9, not 0-21
It's that guy again <B  2008-06-16 06:53:16 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-15 18:24:05 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-06-16 09:40:22 
Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
"Krus T. Olfard"  2008-06-16 21:53:54 
OT: Re: 5-9? Not 0-21?
Paul Knight <knightp@[  2008-06-16 16:57:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 4:34:47 CST 2008.