On Aug 20, 3:30 pm, " krp" <krp24...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:ae8bb27e-34a2-4ef8-aa9e-9670bb15d4f3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> Betty not everyone had the same experiences you describe. I am no
big
> >> fan
> >> of "plastic tits" Betty. I am no huge fan of "milkers." I think many
> >> women
> >> could get breast reduction surgery. But others like the triple
> >> D's..........
> >> Far be it from me to insult them. But you LIVE for being NASTY.
>
> > Ken, you're a pitiful person. I don't mean that in a harsh way. I
> > simply pity you, and those like you.
> > You rant about issues that you believe in, civil rights that ensure
> > each person has the right to their own belief, religion, freedom of
> > speech, etc, and then come here and publicly attempt to humiliate me
> > for MY beliefs? Try to down me for having developed those beliefs
> > from FIRST HAND knowledge?
>
> Betty lots of people have FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE that differs from
YOURS!
> Of course you could be somebody like JANE wqho shovelked mountains of
> BULL**** about subjects he had ABSOLIYELY NO knowledge of, such as Cuba.
BUT
> you BACKED his bull**** about Cuba 100% even those it was absurd on its
> face.
I don't know anyone named Jane, and I never took part in the
conversations regarding the structure and laws of Cuba because I have
absolutely NO knowldge of the country and never claimed I did.
Please provide proof you lying fool.
Wanna have me raped now too? Or would you rather encourage someone to
assault me, oh high minister of civil rights?
>
> > That's the thing that I don't understand about you internet
> > 'advocates'...no one seems to have the 'right' but you, and who you
> > choose.
>
> No I think that more applies to you. You and Sullivan are the ones
who
> "NEED" to RUN things.
Yes, Ken, that's why *I* post hundreds and hundreds of posts per week,
at every hour of the day as you do.
Keep kidding yourself, or is that the geriatric senility setting in?
>
> > No Ken, not everyone has had the experiences that I have described,
> > but there are thousands of women who's names were in a class action
> > lawsuit who did.
>
> Actually there were barely a hunded women in the class action suit.
YOU
> ripped ANYONE who DARED to disagree with your ****!
Ken, you're a real riot.
You say that there were less than 100 women who were involved in the
class action lawsuit?
That's kinda funny, Ken, because out of your supposed 'less than' 100
women, over 61,000 of them have had approved claims.
http://www.tortcomm.org/claimsdata.shtml
|
