On Aug 20, 10:02=A0am, " krp" <krp24...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:329dcb05-9b8e-4320-9542-a447ab54b9af@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> < You're simply a pathetic liar.
>
> =A0 =A0 Danny you are such a LOSER you DESPERATELY need to believe that!
>
> < You claim you've 'been the subject of dozens of newspaper articles
> < including the New York Times, Boston Globe, Los Angles Times, San
> < Francisco Herald-Examiner, Milwaukee Journal, St. Petersburg Times,
> < Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Philadelphia Inquirer, and
> < others'."
>
> <Yet when asked to provide proof of these articles you claim you were
> < the subject of articles in Playboy and USA Today.
>
> =A0 =A0 Yes Danny. GIVE ME A GODDDAMN LINK! I WANT A LINK!YOU MUST GIVE
M=
E
> LINKS!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/msg/4d=
78d4ca496c1262?hl=3Den
> (danny screams stomping his feet and pounding the wall.) =A0I believe
> the page number for the Artcile =A0by Asa Barber in Playboy was
provided.=
You
> really ARE getting desperate, aren't ya Danny? The Utah study blew up in
> your face you you are trying a NEW ATTACK.
The name pangborn provides no hits in either magazine.
Odd that you were the SUBJECT of the articles as you claim on your
website.
> < And a simple search of both provides ZERO hits on your name!
>
> =A0 =A0 But, Danny, you are LYING again. =A0YOU SWORE that the LOC
showed=
NOTHING
> for me. Then Mike showed a LOC copyright and youi **** your pants.
So you're giving up on claiming you were the SUBJECT of the articles
in Playboy and USA Today.
> You TRIED
> to attack me on the Utah study and that didn't work out so well for you.
It wasn't a study.
To quote ****bag himself "it was little more than a review of
available data..."
|
