On Aug 19, 11:32 am, Firemonkey <firemonke...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Aug 19, 11:48 am, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 19, 7:48 am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 19, 5:51 am, " krp" <krp24...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > >
>news:f6e884a5-c6a2-4e29-858f-c6ccaae9124f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > >> >> > I do, however, think he was abusing her. Nothing ***ual
about it,
> > > > >> >> > just plain old cold shower treatment abuse.
> > > > >> >> > I've no need to look for more signs. Greg told us that's
what he
> > > > >> >> > did. He said that he made the little girl take fast cold
showers
> > > > >> >> > because she was wetting herself. You can't get any more
specific
> > > > >> >> > than
> > > > >> >> > that. Can you?
>
> > > > >> >> Betty I might agree that Greg's ideas of how to stop the
kid from
> > > > >> >> wetting are a bit strange. But are you aware that some
social workers
> > > > >> >> actually recommend this technique? Which is another reason I
think
> > > > >> >> social
> > > > >> >> workers are QUACKS! No - it would not be anything *I* would
do. But
> > > > >> >> Greg
> > > > >> >> is
> > > > >> >> just an ordinary guy, he's going to rely on what, to HIM is
a
> > > > >> >> professional,
> > > > >> >> tells him to do. He's a VERY naive person.
>
> > > > >> > Well Ken, I'm from Missouri, so you'll have to SHOW ME that
ANY social
> > > > >> > worker is recommending this.
>
> > KRP > Look up REBIRTHING Betty!!!
>
> > BW > Get your head out of your ass.
> > BW > I didn't ask you about re-birthing.
> > BW > I asked you to show me social workers
> > BW > recommending cold shower treatment
> > BW > for wetting. Can't? I figured as much.
> > BW > Trying to change the subject won't do
> > BW > a thing to bump up your poor
> > BW > credibility on this, or any other issue.
>
> > KRP > Betty get [your] head out of your OWN ass.
> > KRP > On Saturday I provided several LINKS
> > KRP > (GIMME GODDDDAMN LINKS - I
> > KRP > WANT LINKS!!!) That discussed "Rage
> > KRP > Reduction Therapy. " Re-birthing is the
> > KRP > terminus of that process. The whole
> > KRP > deal is a concept embraced by
> > KRP > SOCIAL WORKERS and NOT
> > KRP > psychologists. They LOVE that VOO
> > KRP > DOO bull****! On the one extreme it
> > KRP > starts with things like cold showers
> > KRP > and holding the child (restraint) then
> > KRP > goes to wrapping the child in a cold
> > KRP > wet sheet and finally REBIRTHING.
> > KRP > All part of the same fukked mentality
> > KRP > Betty. The whole deal may start with
> > KRP > some reasonable efforts to deal with
> > KRP > the child's anger, but add a social
> > KRP > worker to the mix and it gets
> > KRP > psychotic pretty fast.Social Workers
> > KRP > are POSITIVE they know MORE about
> > KRP > medicine, psychology, psychiatry etc
> > KRP > than those who have actually
> > KRP > studied in those fields. Kind of like
> > KRP > Kane, YOU and Sullivan. Not to mention
> > KRP > Kunt Wills the world's greatest living
> > KRP > authority on EVERYTHING!
>
> > BW > Just can't stick to the topic, can you Ken?
> > BW > Did you take your meds today?
>
> > Topics drift.
> > You should KNOW that, Betty!
>
> > The question is whether it was a logical
> > evolution of the conversation.
>
> > Ivan Gowch's anti-spanking rant was the first topic.
>
> > Firemonkey changed the topic to cold showers.
>
> Not really accurate there gag, I brought you forcing an unrelated 6-7
> year old little girl into a cold c shower for suspious wetting
> accidents.
>
> > Apparently she thought that Ivan was on the ropes
> > and couldn't let it end like that.
>
> I have never thought Ivan was on the ropes. Wher i do not agree with
> everything he says, he does have some very good points about raising
> children.
>
> > It was really more of a personal attack on me
> > when she switched to the cold shower thing.
>
> True
>
> > Betty, you didn't ***** when that topic drift
> > took place.
>
> > But now that it ****fted to cold showers
>
> no, it ****fted to you forcing an unrelated 6-7 yeard old girl into a
> clod shower.
> and
>
> > Ken pointed out that Social Workers have
> > done far worse
>
> So you finally get how harmful your actions were, good, we are making
> progress.
>
> than cold showers, you
>
> > think that topic drift is something to ***** about?
>
> > It's sad FOR YOU that the cold showers gambit
> > was played out.
>
> Oh gag, its far from played out. The rebirthing thing was brought up
> to take the focus off where the topic had "drifted" to, your abuse of
> Lisa's daughter.
Typical focus ****ft.
Bring up something MUCH worse to minimize the topic.
They're old hat at it.
>
> > You sure seemed PISSED when ken brought up
> > the "re-birthing" stuff! LOL Touchy subject for you?
>
> > Ken, We HAVE in the past discussed the
> > sickness that is/was "re-birthing".
>
> > Apparently a considerable ****tion of adopters and
> > even Fosters had some psychological hangups
> > with the fact that the child did not actually
> > spring from their own loins.
>
> Is that why you forced the little girl into the cold showers, as a new
> mothers paramour you had some some psychological hangups with the fact
> that the child did not actually spring from your own loins.
Maybe it was some bizarre form of 'baptism' for him.
>
> Very plasible gag.
>
> > Re-birthing for some seems to be more about the
> > bizarre psychology in the "new Mom"'s head
> > and fulfilling some feeling that she is incomplete
> > because she did NOT actually make a baby.
>
> Does that work for new Daddy-Os as well? Were you having some bizarre
> psychology in the "new Moms paramour"'s head and fulfilling some
> feeling that you were incomplete
> because you did NOT actually make a baby
>
> > Parts of it resemble some strange brainwa****ng purpose.
>
> I agree.
>
> The disaster that forcing cold showers is reveals some
> bizarre psychology,
> Some heavy duty brain rot that shows that
> all is NOT well in mamas paramour land.
> regarding feelings of""owner****p"" and denial that the kid was
> another mans or deluding themselves into the
> fantasy that they actually gave seed to the childs creation.
>
> > Much worse than mere cold showers, and
> > done by the heros of the socialist
> > revolution, the ""superior"" adoptive parents!
>
> And again, So you finally get how harmful your actions were, good, we
> are making progress.
Are you holding your breath? I wouldn't suggest it.
>
> > They have fewer psychological kinks, supposedly... <grin>
>
> > When a parent does something like a cold shower
> > that you personally decide is a kinky,
>
> Kinky at its worst gag, cruel, controlling abusive and unnecessary At
> best.
>
> it's
>
> > MONUMENTAL but when SW's do stuff that
> > is truly kinky and DEADLY, you
> > want to MINIMIZE that, right Betty?
>
> > And cry foul about the natural topic drift! LOL- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
|
