DS > So anyone who believes what you did to the little girl was
DS > inappropriate is an "ultraliberal sicko?
G > Yes.
DS > Even pangborn says he wouldn't have
DS > done to the little girl what you did, grag.
KRP > Not because I see what Greg did as so
KRP > HORRIBLE, but because I am more
KRP > streetwise and KNOW that PERVERTS
KRP > like YOU and Roberta are a dime a dozen!
DS > You're not "streetwise" at all, ****bag.
DS > You're simply a pathetic liar.
DS > You claim you've 'been the subject of
DS > dozens of newspaper articles including
DS > the New York Times, Boston Globe,
DS > Los Angles Times, San Francisco
DS > Herald-Examiner, Milwaukee Journal,
DS > St. Petersburg Times, Chicago Tribune,
DS > Los Angeles Times, Philadelphia
DS > Inquirer, and others'."
DS >
DS > Yet when asked to provide proof
DS > of these articles you claim you were
DS > the subject of articles in Playboy and USA Today.
G > Even better!
DS > And a simple search of both provides ZERO hits on your name!
G > Did it?
DS > Prove otherwise.
G > You withheld the hit you found on Ken's research.
DS > Which hit?
Show us the search hit, Dan!
DS > ****bag himself wrote "it was little
DS > more than a review of available data..."
DS > It was little more than correlating some data.
So? Then post the search hit link!
|
